2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing two types of engineering visualizations: Task-related manipulations matter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cölln's paper on visual perception found that performance was improved when manipulating threedimensional CAD vs. static three-dimensional CAD or two-dimensional engineering drawings [13]. This result supports the hypothesis that simulation based learning using interactive three-dimensional models will improve visualization performance.…”
Section: Development Of the Mcmaster Engineeringsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Cölln's paper on visual perception found that performance was improved when manipulating threedimensional CAD vs. static three-dimensional CAD or two-dimensional engineering drawings [13]. This result supports the hypothesis that simulation based learning using interactive three-dimensional models will improve visualization performance.…”
Section: Development Of the Mcmaster Engineeringsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Digital prototyping involves the use of computer-aided design (CAD), computer-automated design (CAutoD) and computer-aided engineering (CAE) software to create, modify and analyze digital models. Some of the benefits that digital prototyping tools have over physical model making include increased productivity, increased design quality and simulation possibilities (e.g., see Colln et al, 2012;Islamoglu & Deger, 2015;Negendahl, 2015). Design research has mainly analyzed the impact of digital prototypes on design processes and design outcomes.…”
Section: Build-and-test In Design Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These applications appear to be highly effective (Israel, Wiese, Mateescu, Zöllner, & Stark, ). In addition to increasing understanding of how size and shape are presented, the depth and spatial vector representations of CAD create more realistic representations for users (Cölln et al ., ; Wexler & Van Boxtel, ). Additionally, the interactive manoeuvrability of CAD offers authentic spatial and 3D messages that reinforce users' perceptions (Cölln et al ., ).…”
Section: Study Background and Motivesmentioning
confidence: 99%