2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Twitter and YouTube networks in information diffusion: The case of the “Occupy Wall Street” movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of gaining product information from other social media participants is gaining as many social media users have increased their fame and influence by sharing common ideas and cultural values through their interactions (S. J. Park, Limb, & Park, 2015). For example consumers evaluating a new cardio exercise machine are likely to seek out and read product evaluations from 'the elliptical lady.'…”
Section: Social Media Communication (Content Positive Valence and Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of gaining product information from other social media participants is gaining as many social media users have increased their fame and influence by sharing common ideas and cultural values through their interactions (S. J. Park, Limb, & Park, 2015). For example consumers evaluating a new cardio exercise machine are likely to seek out and read product evaluations from 'the elliptical lady.'…”
Section: Social Media Communication (Content Positive Valence and Nementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-occurrence is also widely observed in webometric data. For example, prior studies examine semantic networks based on co-occurrence of words in various social media posts (Kim, Heo, Choi, & Park, 2014;Shapiro & Park, 2015;Xu et al, 2015Xu et al, , 2016Park, Lim, & Park, 2015). Co-occurrence of words can reveal thematic/topic similarity and variation in online public discussions of issues (Heo, Park, Kim, & Park, 2016), or the media's framing of international events (Jiang, Barnett, & Taylor, 2016).…”
Section: Applying Network Analysis To International Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, social network analysis is used as one of the big data analysis techniques, which is easy to understand the semantics of the network by grasping the frequency of appearance of key words. The most commonly used indicator among social network analysis indicators is centrality, which allows one actor to identify which nodes play a major role in the entire network (Park et al, 2015). Indicators for centrality analysis include degree centrality and closeness centrality based on the connectivity between objects, betweenness centrality based on intermediary between entities, and eigenvector centrality based on the weight of the relative connectivity of individuals (Scott, 2017;Wasserman & Frust, 1994).…”
Section: B Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It takes into account the centrality of directly connected entities as well as indirectly linked entities, so that words with overall influence in the network can be identified. Assuming that words with high centrality values affect other words (Park et al, 2015), a user with a high centrality can be regarded as the most influential core user. Words such as hypothetical (0.039), trading (0.037), technology (0.035), future (0.030), finance (0.030), and hacking (0.030) can be interpreted as having high effects.…”
Section: B Analysis Of Powerful Words In the Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%