BackgroundSuperspreading infections play an important role in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Superspreading is caused primarily by heterogeneity in social contact rates, and therefore represents an opportunity for targeting surveillance and control via consideration of social network topologies, particularly in resource-limited settings. Yet, it remains unclear how to implement such surveillance and control, espeically when network data is unavailable.MethodsWe evaluated the efficiency of a testing strategy that targeted potential superspreading individuals based on their degree centrality on a social network compared to a random testing strategy in the context of low testing capacity. We simulated SARS-CoV-2 dynamics on two contact networks from rural Madagascar and measured the epidemic duration, infection burden, and tests needed to end the epidemics. In addition, we examined the robustness of this approach when individuals’ true degree centralities were unknown and were instead estimated via readily-available socio-demographic variables.FindingsTargeted testing of potential superspreaders reduced the infection burden by 40-63% at low testing capacities, while requiring between 45-78% fewer tests compared to random testing. Further, targeted testing remained more efficient when the true network topology was unknown and prioritization was based on socio-demographic characteristics.InterpretationIncorporating social network topology into epidemic control strategies is an effective public health strategy for health systems suffering from low testing capacity and can be implemented via socio-demographic proxies when social networks are unknown.FundingThis research was funded by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche, a NIH-SSF-NIFA Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Disease Award (No. 1R01-TW011493-01), and a Duke University Provost’s Collaboratory grant.