Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Conference on Emerging Network Experiment and Technology - CoNEXT'05 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1095921.1095952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing traffic engineering objective functions

Abstract: We compare and evaluate how well-known and novel networkwide objective functions for Traffic Engineering (TE) algorithms fulfil TE requirements. To compare the objective functions we model the TE problem as a linear program and solve it to optimality, thus finding for each objective function the best possible target of any heuristic TE algorithm. Our first results on the GÉANT network suggest that they can give quite different results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The objective function (1) measures the maximum arc utilization, which has to be minimized; as shown in [51], and validated with the results in the present paper, minimizing the maximum link utilization tends to maximize the available bandwidth, thus balancing the load in the network as a side effect. Constraints (2) ensure that u max is an upper bound on the utilization of each arc, measured as the ratio between the traffic routed along it via the IS-IS/OSPF protocol and the MPLS-TE technology (first and second term of the left-hand-side, respectively) and its capacity.…”
Section: Nominal Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The objective function (1) measures the maximum arc utilization, which has to be minimized; as shown in [51], and validated with the results in the present paper, minimizing the maximum link utilization tends to maximize the available bandwidth, thus balancing the load in the network as a side effect. Constraints (2) ensure that u max is an upper bound on the utilization of each arc, measured as the ratio between the traffic routed along it via the IS-IS/OSPF protocol and the MPLS-TE technology (first and second term of the left-hand-side, respectively) and its capacity.…”
Section: Nominal Modelsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The problem can be defined as follows. Given the network topology of the network and an estimate of the traffic matrix to be routed on it, the problem is to find a routing scheme that optimizes the network in terms of user performance and efficient use of network resources [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%