2019
DOI: 10.1007/s41324-019-00273-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing three transition potential modeling for identifying suitable sites for REDD+ projects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can easily recognize the intricate patterns from the database and model the nonlinear relationships [44]. Although many neural networks have been developed but MLPNN is largely utilized in the various applications [45,46].…”
Section: Lulc Simulation and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can easily recognize the intricate patterns from the database and model the nonlinear relationships [44]. Although many neural networks have been developed but MLPNN is largely utilized in the various applications [45,46].…”
Section: Lulc Simulation and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The capability of MLPNN to model numerous or even entire transitions at one time makes MLPNN-MCM better than other models to predict the future pattern of LULC [27]. It also automatically produces several parameter values that take a lesser amount of data for training and reduce the calibration time of the model [46]. MLPNN also combines the different parameters that affects the various LULC transitions [26,27].…”
Section: Lulc Simulation and Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, achieving the goals and effective and successful results of REDD+ projects in Iran requires effective policy‐making, accurate and transparent project design, and step‐by‐step monitoring during project implementation. Factors such as sovereignty, capacity, and rights to occupy land, justice, transparency, indigenous people's rights and knowledge, and increasing local and institutional capacities have been some of the most important reasons for the failure of these projects in Iran (Parsamehr et al, 2019; Shooshtari & Gholamalifard, 2015). In addition, initiatives like REDD+ may improve the standard of living for people who depend on forests by reducing poverty, increasing income through payments made in exchange for carbon credits, and providing extra advantages like better land tenure or carbon ownership (Bayrak & Marafa, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…REDD+ projects are mainly handed over to the public and semi‐private sectors. Therefore, some of these projects are research‐based projects supported by research institutions, and some others are governmental‐based and no private sector is involved in the implementation of these projects (Parsamehr et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the emissions of GHGs are known to be strongly influenced by LULC change (Cooper et al, 2020;Hundera et al, 2020), scenario analysis with LULC models can play a major role in providing information to decision makers. By purpose of spatial targeting of REDD studies, LULC change models such as Land Change Modeler (LCM), Geomod, CA-MARCOV and CLUE-S have been used for the LULC changes prediction, specially forest loss trend (Feng et al, 2020;Tang et al, 2020;Parsamehr et al, 2019;Mena et al, 2017;Bununu et al, 2016;Kim, 2010;Hewson et al, 2019;Redowan, 2019). Some models such as LCM that permits the simulation of future scenario is integrated with a REDD steps to determine and model anthropogenic GHGs emission reductions (Bununu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%