Comparing the web and mobile platforms of a social Q&A service from the user’s perspective

Abstract

Purpose As an increasing number of users have acquired information across the web and mobile platforms for social question and answering (Q&A), it is of interest to explore whether there are differences in social Q&A usages between the two platforms. The purpose of this paper is to compare web and mobile platforms of a social Q&A service from the user’s perspective in terms of three dimensions, namely, demographics, individual-based constructs, and information-based constructs. Design/methodology/approach Because Zhihu.com is one of the most popular social Q&A sites in China, the authors used online questionnaires to investigate its users’ perceptions of these three dimensions. From January to March 2016, the authors obtained 278 valid responses in total through snowball and convenient sampling. Collected data are analyzed through descriptive statistics and inferential statistics. Findings The results indicate that there exist significant differences between web users and mobile users on Zhihu.com in terms of gender, affinity, and information seeking. More specifically, compared to the male users, more female users rely on the mobile platform to access the information service; mobile users perceive higher affinity with Zhihu.com than web users; and mobile users perceive higher information-seeking intention than web users do. Originality/value Regarding the theoretical aspect, this study proposes a conceptual framework for comparison between the web and mobile platforms of social Q&A from the user’s perspective. Regarding the practical aspect, the comparative results of this study could give social Q&A service providers useful information about users’ differences between web and mobile platforms of social Q&A services.

Promoting users’ intention to share online health articles on social media: The role of confirmation bias

“…Because our research was conducted in China, all the items of measuring the constructs were translated into Chinese through employing a translation committee approach (e.g., Chen, Chua, & Deng, 2018 ; Fu, Chen, & Zheng, 2020 ). To ensure the face validity of the items, the authors participated in the translation, all of whom were effectively bilingual in Mandarin and English.…”

Exploring an adverse impact of smartphone overuse on academic performance via health issues: a stimulus-organism-response perspective

“…However, few studies have employed the S-O-R framework to investigate students' usage of smartphones. This is perhaps because past research has paid much attention to direct benefits and/or risks of individuals' smartphone usage (e.g., Chen et al, 2018;Choi et al, 2018;Christensen et al, 2016;Mendoza et al, 2018). Unfortunately, potential mediators between smartphone usage and individuals' achievements are not well explored.…”

User adoption of a hybrid social tagging approach in an online knowledge community

“…SE refers to the conviction that an individual is competent for executing the behavior successfully so as to bring about the outcomes (Bandura, 1977). Chen et al (2018) used SE to portray users’ capacities to propose appropriate information acquisition strategies based on information needs. With a view of a hybrid social tagging approach, the bottom layers are constructed based on users’ behaviors by creating new tags and designating their relationships.…”