2016
DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Variability Between Measurements for Sarcopenia Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Computed Tomography Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
34
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
6
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only 8 patients in this cohort had both CT and MRI scans available for comparative analysis, we could not identify any significant differences in measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area values between the 2 modalities, in keeping with an analysis of scans from 61 patients recently published by Tandon et al The strong agreement between these 2 modalities supports the use of either CT or MRI imaging in future studies investigating cross‐sectional muscle area and sarcopenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Although only 8 patients in this cohort had both CT and MRI scans available for comparative analysis, we could not identify any significant differences in measurement of cross‐sectional muscle area values between the 2 modalities, in keeping with an analysis of scans from 61 patients recently published by Tandon et al The strong agreement between these 2 modalities supports the use of either CT or MRI imaging in future studies investigating cross‐sectional muscle area and sarcopenia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Preliminary data published by our site suggests that MRI and CT performed on the same patients are correlated for muscle mass quantification 35 . Larger studies and studies evaluating the detection of longitudinal changes comparing both modalities are needed to further support the interchangeability of these two scanning methods.…”
Section: Use Of the Subjective Global Assessment (Sga) In Cirrhosismentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Imaging (CT/MRI) is often performed during LT assessment and routine follow‐up and, therefore, may be opportunistically applied to evaluate SMM in pediatric and adult liver populations without additional cost and radiation risk. MRI and CT are cited as the gold standard for body composition assessment, and they can be used interchangeably to quantify SMM . The major limitation of CT is the radiation exposure, particularly in pediatrics .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRI and CT are cited as the gold standard for body composition assessment, and they can be used interchangeably to quantify SMM. (2,45) The major limitation of CT is the radiation exposure, particularly in pediatrics. (46) MRI does not involve radiation, but the high cost and the need for trained analysts may limit serial measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%