2005
DOI: 10.1623/hysj.2005.50.6.1037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the stream re-aeration coefficient estimated from ANN and empirical models / Comparaison d'estimations par un RNA et par des modèles empiriques du coefficient de réaération en cours d'eau

Abstract: Dissolved oxygen (DO) is one of the most useful indices of river's health and the stream re-aeration coefficient is an important input to computations related to DO. Normally, this coefficient is expressed as a function of several variables, such as mean stream velocity, shear stress velocity, bed slope, flow depth, and Froude number. However, in free surface flows, some of these variables are interrelated, and it is possible to obtain simplified stream re-aeration equations. In recent years, different functio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…River discharge was obtained through calculations using flow velocity data, yielding values of 0.86 m 3 s -1 during rainy season and 0.252 m 3 s -1 during dry season. In this model, the value of the reaeration coefficient (k a ) used the equation from Jha et al (2004), while the dispersion coefficient (Ex) used the equation from Iwasa and Aya (1991); Jain and Jha (2005); Peruzzi et al (2021). Based on previous studies, combining these two coefficients provided adequate analysis results and was suitable for Cikakembang River (Polisar, 2023).…”
Section: Water Quality Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…River discharge was obtained through calculations using flow velocity data, yielding values of 0.86 m 3 s -1 during rainy season and 0.252 m 3 s -1 during dry season. In this model, the value of the reaeration coefficient (k a ) used the equation from Jha et al (2004), while the dispersion coefficient (Ex) used the equation from Iwasa and Aya (1991); Jain and Jha (2005); Peruzzi et al (2021). Based on previous studies, combining these two coefficients provided adequate analysis results and was suitable for Cikakembang River (Polisar, 2023).…”
Section: Water Quality Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, researchers have looked for easier, cheaper and more reliable methods to estimate the SSL and decided to use this model (Ardıclıoglu et al 2007;Cigizoglu 2001;Tayfur and Guldal 2006). The ANN practices have been used in many branches of water supply applications successfully (Cigizoglu 2001;Cobaner 2011;Jain and Jha 2005;Kisi 2006; Schulze et al 2005), and it has been thought to give encouraging outcomes, especially in modeling the suspended sediment (Alp and Cigizoglu 2007;Ardıclıoglu et al 2007;Cigizoglu 2004;Jain 2001;Kisi 2008;Tayfur 2002;Tayfur and Guldal 2006;Zhu et al 2007). Tayfur and Guldal (2006) found an ANN model to estimate the daily amount of SSL in rivers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a multiuse and powerful tool for modeling complex processes and characterizing uncertainty in water quality evaluation. Examples include combining the fuzzy sets theory and grey systems theory [Chang et al, 1996]; self-organizing maps and fuzzy sets theory [Lu and Lo, 2002]; ANN embedded Monte Carlo method [Zou et al, 2002]; and ANN and empirical models [Jain and Jha, 2005]. Another way to develop a hybrid model is to combine informational entropy theory, especially the principle of maximum entropy (POME), and engineering fuzzy set theory (EFST).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%