2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the role of selective and divided attention in the composite face effect: Insights from Attention Operating Characteristic (AOC) plots and cross-contingency correlations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, he was able to demonstrate the existence of composite face effect, but failed to obtain Garner interference and super-capacity with the same composite faces. These results are consistent with analytic processing (Fitousi, 2015, 2016). Therefore, further studies are required to help the controversial issue.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Specifically, he was able to demonstrate the existence of composite face effect, but failed to obtain Garner interference and super-capacity with the same composite faces. These results are consistent with analytic processing (Fitousi, 2015, 2016). Therefore, further studies are required to help the controversial issue.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Their findings appear to implicate that holistic processing and part-based processing did not operate independently. On the other hand, Fitousi (2015, 2016) employed the system factorial technology (SFT) as a means for mathematical modeling of the nature of face processing, and argued that face recognition is achieved analytically rather than holistically. Specifically, he was able to demonstrate the existence of composite face effect, but failed to obtain Garner interference and super-capacity with the same composite faces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a potential reason for the failure to find a strong direct link between holistic processing and ToM. Moreover, holistic face processing is not only a highly experience-dependent ability ( Gauthier and Bukach, 2007 ), but also a perceptual strategy, that can be adopted or not, depending on the requirements of the task ( Fitousi, 2016 ). Face recognition ability, on the other hand, is a basic ability ( Wilmer et al, 2010 ), which cannot be applied or not, contingently with the situation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miller and Bonnell (1994) instructed participants to pay a certain amount of attention to a line-length discrimination task on the left side of the screen and the remaining attention to the right side and revealed that sensitivity increased with the proportion of attention devoted to that side. Fitousi (2016) instructed participants to allocate differential amounts of their attention to the top and bottom halves of a face. Such instructions were effective in modifying the amount of attention allocated to either half of the face, with participants’ performance improving as a function of attention allocation (Fitousi, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fitousi (2016) instructed participants to allocate differential amounts of their attention to the top and bottom halves of a face. Such instructions were effective in modifying the amount of attention allocated to either half of the face, with participants’ performance improving as a function of attention allocation (Fitousi, 2016). Atkinson, Berry, Waterman, Baddeley, Hitch, and Allen (2018) used probe frequencies (i.e., how frequently a more valuable item was tested) to examine whether memory for an item was enhanced if participants were told it would be tested more frequently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%