2014
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2014.978822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the results of PSInSAR and GNSS on slow motion landslides, Koyulhisar, Turkey

Abstract: There are numerous methods used nowadays to monitor landslide movements. Of these methods, Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) and Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) are the ones that are most commonly used. In this study, the amounts of movements acquired via these two methods were compared and relations between them were analysed. The Koyulhisar landslide region was selected as the field of study. In this study, 10 Envisat images of the region taken between 2006 and 2008 were evaluated us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(35 reference statements)
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in Figure 10 and in Table 3 show good consistency of PSI results with GNSS results. They also indicate that PSI results can substantially increase reliability of the interpretation of the GNSS results (Hastaoglu, 2016).…”
Section: Results Of Psi Vs Results Of Gnssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results presented in Figure 10 and in Table 3 show good consistency of PSI results with GNSS results. They also indicate that PSI results can substantially increase reliability of the interpretation of the GNSS results (Hastaoglu, 2016).…”
Section: Results Of Psi Vs Results Of Gnssmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Equation 2, the satellite unit vector is defined in detail. Here, for the descending and ascending transition, q is the heading angle, and f is the incidence angle (Arikan et al, 2010;Hastaoglu, 2016;Fuhrmann and Garthwaite, 2019;Ezquerro et al, 2020).…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ciampalini et al [17] combined PSInSAR with the steepest slope velocity and its variance to refine the landslide susceptibility map. Hastaoglu et al [18] used ENVISAT and GNSS data to verify PSInSAR accuracy. Ciampalini et al [19] adopted sensors on buildings and PSInSAR for building deformation and risk classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%