Comparing the Prevalence of Poor Sleep and Stress Metrics in Basic versus Advanced Life Support Emergency Medical Services Personnel

Abstract

Background: Emergency medical services (EMS) personnel frequently encounter occupational factors that increase the risk of poor sleep and stress. The national prevalence of poor sleep and stress in EMS personnel is unclear, especially differences between personnel at the basic (BLS) versus advanced (ALS) life support levels. The objectives of this study were to: (1) estimate the prevalence of sleep and stress metrics in EMS personnel; and (2) compare these metrics between BLS and ALS-certified personnel. Methods: This study was a survey of recertifying nationally-certified EMS personnel working in civilian settings. Respondents completed an electronic questionnaire assessing their sleep quality; workday, non-workday, and average sleep duration; sleep debt; perceived stress; and chronic stress. Survey-weighted Poisson regression models were used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) comparing BLS (emergency medical technician) to ALS (advanced emergency medical technician and paramedic) for each metric. Models were adjusted for age, sex, minority status, education level, EMS agency type, service type, EMS role, and significant interactions. Results: A total of 17,913 (response rate ¼ 19%) responses were received with 17,522 included in the analysis. Adjusted PRs were significantly higher for ALS-certified personnel compared to BLS-certified for poor sleep quality (PR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.20-1.27) and short (<7 hours) or long (!9 hours) workday sleep duration (PR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.15-1.19). Significant interactions were found between certification level and sex (average sleep duration) or age category (sleep debt, perceived stress, and chronic stress). The highest prevalence of short or long average sleep duration was among ALS men. Sleep debt, perceived stress, and chronic stress differed by age group between certification levels with higher PRs for ALS regardless of age group. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of poor sleep and stress in EMS personnel, with evidence of the highest prevalence among ALS-certified personnel. Evidence of effect modification by age category and among BLS and ALS personnel suggests that interventions could target certain subgroups, such as older ALS personnel, to be most effective. Continued focus on sleep health and stress reduction is needed to improve the health and well-being of the EMS workforce.

Emergency Medical Services Personnel Awareness and Training about Personal Protective Equipment during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Maintenance of National EMS Certification is not required in all states; therefore, these findings may not be generalizable to the wider EMS community. The low response rate, while typical for this population (21,22) increases the possibility of response and selection bias. Several factors (e.g., sex or certification level) are known to be related to survey response (22, 23).…”

Associations between Parent–Child Communication on Sexual Health and Drug Use and Use of Drugs during Sex among Urban Black Youth

“…Additionally, we conducted Chi-square tests test for binary and categorical measures between the study outcomes (i.e., drug use and sex while on drugs or alcohol use) and the contextual variables. Next, prevalence ratios (PR) were generated using a Poisson regression with robust errors due to high prevalence of the outcome, drug use [ 43 , 44 , 45 ]. The model was used to estimate the adjusted prevalence ratios, controlling for potential confounders selected a priori based on the prior literature.…”

Should public safety shift workers be allowed to nap while on duty?

“…7 Half of EMS clinicians do not obtain adequate sleep before or between scheduled shifts, and greater than half report poor sleep quality. 7,25 Many EMS clinicians screen positive for untreated sleep disorders, 26 one-third report excessive daytime sleepiness, 27 and at least half report unsatisfactory recovery between scheduled shifts. 28 Many work extended shifts (eg, 24 hours), excessive overtime hours, and between 35% and 45% work at more than one job.…”