Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study

Özalp, Öznur; Tezerişener, Hüseyin Alican; Kocabalkan, Burak; Büyükkaplan, Ulviye Şebnem; Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa; Kaya, Göksel Şimşek; Altay, Mehmet Ali; Sindel, Alper

doi:10.5624/isd.2018.48.4.269

Cited by 28 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Özalp et al compared the measurement of anatomical structures between panoramic radiograph and CBCT. They found that CBCT was more accurate in treatment planning (38) .…”

Section: Cone Beam-computed Tomography (Cbct) and Dental Implant Softmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques

Henprasert

Dawson

El‐Kerdani

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Queiruga for your assistance in developing the measurement protocol and for providing training on GeoMagic software. Thank you to Kyle Bennett for his technical support in milling the surgical guides. Thank you to my co-residents for your help and sharing practical suggestions throughout the years of my study. I am also grateful to all the faculty, staff and dental assistants for their support and assistance.

show abstract

“…Özalp et al compared the measurement of anatomical structures between panoramic radiograph and CBCT. They found that CBCT was more accurate in treatment planning (38) .…”

Section: Cone Beam-computed Tomography (Cbct) and Dental Implant Softmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques

Henprasert

Dawson

El‐Kerdani

et al. 2020

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…16 realizou-se a avaliação da qualidade óssea por meio da análise de fractais a partir de exames de TCFC, devido a sua maior resolução e qualidade quando comparados à radiografia panorâmica e outras imagens radiográficas bidimensionais. 12,17,18 Neste estudo, os valores encontrados de DF e…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Dimensão fractal e lacunaridade como parâmetros de avaliação da qualidade óssea na mandíbula de indivíduos saudáveis: análise por meio da tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico

Faria

Werneck

et al. 2021

hu rev

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introdução: A qualidade óssea pode ser avaliada pela análise de textura nos exames de imagem, por meio da mensuração da dimensão fractal (DF) e lacunaridade (Lac). A DF está relacionada com a complexidade da organização estrutural óssea e a Lac representa a distribuição e o tamanho dos espaços vazios. Objetivo: Avaliar a qualidade óssea trabecular em região posterior da mandíbula por meio da DF e Lac e analisar o volume ósseo no exame de tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico (TCFC), em indivíduos saudáveis, e, ainda, comparando homens e mulheres. Material e Métodos: 21 exames de TCFC foram utilizados. Utilizou-se o software ImageJ com dez cortes axiais sequenciais de cada paciente, delimitando a região de interesse (ROI) entre canino e primeiro molar inferiores, de ambos os lados. Foram avaliados os parâmetros: a) Bone Volume (BV), Tissue Volume (TV) e BV/TV, pelo processo de binarização; b) DF e Lac pelo método de Box-couting, em escala de cinza, sem binarização. Resultados: Na comparação entre os lados, BV e TV apresentaram diferença significativa (p=0,02 e 0,01, respectivamente), com maiores valores para o lado direito. Na comparação entre os sexos não houve diferença significativa. Os valores de DF apresentaram média de 0,87 para mulheres e 0,86 para homens. Valores de Lac foram em média 0,17 para mulheres e 0,15 para homens. A idade apresentou correlação negativa significativa com o volume ósseo. Conclusão: DF e Lac são parâmetros viáveis para serem analisados quando se trata de acessar a qualidade óssea trabecular em mandíbula. Foram encontrados valores menores que 1 para DF, e abaixo de 0,17 para Lac, em indivíduos saudáveis. Tanto DF quanto Lac não mostraram diferenças entre homens e mulheres. O osso trabecular na região posterior da mandíbula apresentou maior volume no lado direito em comparação ao esquerdo, e não houve diferença entre os sexos.

show abstract

“…5 andincapability of displaying the bone width. 6 Due to the introduction of cone beam computed tomography, preoperative threedimensional planning has become popular. Nowadays new technologies are influencing implant placement procedures and enforce our capability in inserting implants according to the virtual planned location.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating the Accuracy of Tooth-Supported vs Mucosa-Supported 3d-Printed Surgical Guide in Dental Implant Placement (Cross-Sectional Study)

Toutangy

Brad

Alzein

et al. 2020

Cumhuriyet Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to estimate the accuracy of implant insertion using stereolithographic 3D-printed surgical guides; two types were evaluated: tooth-supported and mucosa-supported guides.Materials and methods: 9 patients were enrolled in this study, 5 males and 4 females, mean age: 49.33 years. 12 implants were inserted using tooth-supported guides While 12 implants were inserted using mucosa-supported guides, deviations between the virtual planned implants and the placed implants were calculated after matching the pre-and post-operative CBCT. Matching process was performed using digital software (Blue Sky Plan); angular deviation, deviation at the entry point and apex of the implant were measured. An independentsamples t-test was performed to compare the two groups using SPSS version 25. Results:The mean angular deviations were 3.67±1.61 degrees and 5.46 ± 2.41 degrees with the tooth-supported and mucosa-supported surgical guides respectively, and the mean three-dimensional deviations were 0.70±0.35 mm and 1.38±0.41 mm at the entry point, 0.99 ±0.52 mm and 1.86 ±0.51 mm at the apex, with the toothsupported and mucosa-supported surgical guides respectively. Conclusions:The results of this study showed that the accuracy of the tooth-supported guide is superior to the mucosa-supported guide.

show abstract

Comparing the precision of panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography in avoiding anatomical structures critical to dental implant surgery: A retrospective study

Cited by 28 publications

References 27 publications

Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques

Comparison of the Accuracy of Implant Position Using Surgical Guides Fabricated by Additive and Subtractive Techniques

Dimensão fractal e lacunaridade como parâmetros de avaliação da qualidade óssea na mandíbula de indivíduos saudáveis: análise por meio da tomografia computadorizada de feixe cônico

Evaluating the Accuracy of Tooth-Supported vs Mucosa-Supported 3d-Printed Surgical Guide in Dental Implant Placement (Cross-Sectional Study)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About