Abstract:Platformization has been used to describe how platforms such as Facebook, Google, Twitter, WhatsApp and TikTok have become increasingly important for how people communicate and access information, including news. But to what extent have news media systems in different countries become platformized? Using online survey data from 46 countries, we show that: (a) although over 90% of internet users use at least one social platform, there are large country differences in the proportion that use them to access news;… Show more
“…Our study goes beyond this assumption by demonstrating a growing infrastructural interdependence. Through analysis of how different CSPs use and integrate various dominant global digital platforms, we aim to understand the level of platformization (Rangaswamy et al, 2020;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023) within CF ecosystems. The research reveals how CSPs' evolution is influenced by platformization processes, encompassing both positive and negative consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each CSP we identify the distinctive strategic elements related to the three analytical dimensions that allow the co-creation, retention, and appropriation of value as ecosystem coordinators (Van Dijck, 2020;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023;Rangaswamy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platformization is a dynamic process, occurring in different degrees, which can be driven and defined by the extension and intensity of digital platforms usage ((Van Dijck et al, 2018;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023). Platform studies is the inter-disciplinary field of research supporting analysis about the role and impact of such platforms and the companies that run them, with implications on how people communicate, use media, access news, information and cultural contents (Duffy et al, 2020;Burgess, 2021;Nielsen & Fletche, 2023).…”
Crowdfunding is a business model where diverse stakeholders operate in a context considered an example of innovation in value co-creation. Based on literature about service ecosystems and value co-creation this study adopts the platformization of society as critical theoretical approach and analytical framework to study the relations between human and technological agents within four crowdfunding ecosystems in Europe. Conceiving Crowdfunding Service Providers (CSPs) as specialized organizations, regulated to operate multi-sided markets and to serve roles as ecosystems’ coordinators, we aim to identify the innovation strategies adopted by CSPs platforms from Italy, France, Spain and Portugal to support their core functions related to governance mechanisms, business models and infrastructural components. To understand the motives for innovation implementation and to compare the competitive adaptation from an ecosystemic perspective, we triangulate qualitative data from multiple sources to explain how and why these strategic choices affect the dynamics of value co-creation. The multiple cases-study systematizes and discusses similarities and differences, particularly as concerns the capacity of CFPs to orchestrate their governance and ICT components to innovate and take advantage of algorithms and AI implementation, collecting more data and money from user interactions. Conclusions highlight the non-neutrality of CSPs, which act as data analysts and translators, adopting more preventive, proactive or reactive strategies of usage and redistribution of the value, created, acquired and aggregated through data. Each CSP can be characterized by its infrastructure and data management approach, metaphorically being more eco-centred or ego-centred.
“…Our study goes beyond this assumption by demonstrating a growing infrastructural interdependence. Through analysis of how different CSPs use and integrate various dominant global digital platforms, we aim to understand the level of platformization (Rangaswamy et al, 2020;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023) within CF ecosystems. The research reveals how CSPs' evolution is influenced by platformization processes, encompassing both positive and negative consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each CSP we identify the distinctive strategic elements related to the three analytical dimensions that allow the co-creation, retention, and appropriation of value as ecosystem coordinators (Van Dijck, 2020;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023;Rangaswamy et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platformization is a dynamic process, occurring in different degrees, which can be driven and defined by the extension and intensity of digital platforms usage ((Van Dijck et al, 2018;Nielsen & Fletcher, 2023). Platform studies is the inter-disciplinary field of research supporting analysis about the role and impact of such platforms and the companies that run them, with implications on how people communicate, use media, access news, information and cultural contents (Duffy et al, 2020;Burgess, 2021;Nielsen & Fletche, 2023).…”
Crowdfunding is a business model where diverse stakeholders operate in a context considered an example of innovation in value co-creation. Based on literature about service ecosystems and value co-creation this study adopts the platformization of society as critical theoretical approach and analytical framework to study the relations between human and technological agents within four crowdfunding ecosystems in Europe. Conceiving Crowdfunding Service Providers (CSPs) as specialized organizations, regulated to operate multi-sided markets and to serve roles as ecosystems’ coordinators, we aim to identify the innovation strategies adopted by CSPs platforms from Italy, France, Spain and Portugal to support their core functions related to governance mechanisms, business models and infrastructural components. To understand the motives for innovation implementation and to compare the competitive adaptation from an ecosystemic perspective, we triangulate qualitative data from multiple sources to explain how and why these strategic choices affect the dynamics of value co-creation. The multiple cases-study systematizes and discusses similarities and differences, particularly as concerns the capacity of CFPs to orchestrate their governance and ICT components to innovate and take advantage of algorithms and AI implementation, collecting more data and money from user interactions. Conclusions highlight the non-neutrality of CSPs, which act as data analysts and translators, adopting more preventive, proactive or reactive strategies of usage and redistribution of the value, created, acquired and aggregated through data. Each CSP can be characterized by its infrastructure and data management approach, metaphorically being more eco-centred or ego-centred.
“…The power relations inherent in this so-called platformization-whereby news organizations young and old are forced to tailor content strategies to fit in with "the selection principles of infrastructural platforms" ( van Dijck et al 2018, p. 66)-is demonstrated whenever the news industry scurries to respond to the tweak of a platform's algorithm for fear of its output being rendered less visible to potential audiences online. However, platformization has been found to have affected news industries to different extents in different countries and sectors, and should be expected to continue evolving (Nielsen and Fletcher 2023).…”
News has long been a contested concept but in the digital era it has become increasingly fractured and multidimensional. This discursive article explores some of the ways in which the news has been disrupted by technological and economic tensions and argues that the social value of news is worth articulating and, where necessary, struggling for. News values have never been universal or unproblematic, and the tension between commercial and social ways of valuing news is intensified today. News values are not fixed and must be open to critique as to how they are meeting citizens’ needs. Societally useful news may be at risk of being marginalized as news organizations struggle to survive, but it is not inevitable that disruption and digitization should undermine journalistic ethics and the social value of news. In arguing that scholars ought to approach news more holistically, to defend it as well as critique it, the article attempts to synthesize what typically appear as discrete approaches to studying news. The article concludes that, if the social value of news is not to suffer further diminution, there is a need to view news through a lens of struggle; a struggle in which journalists, audiences, scholars and, indeed, all citizens have a part to play.
This article evaluates the extent of social media policing in fact-checking (as opposed to verifying public figures’ statements) and the thematic convergence across eight countries in Europe and Latin America. Based on audience reach, we collected links from various organizations (independent outlets, legacy media, or global news agencies). A representative stratified sample of 25% resulted in 3,154 articles. Among the findings, the trend of social media policing prevails across countries and organizations, except for most European legacy media. Independent news-born fact-checking organizations follow a convergent path, sharing more similarities with their global counterparts than their national media peers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.