2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2011.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the mid-vastus and medial parapatellar approaches in total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis of short term outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in lateral retinacular release, blood loss, straight leg raise, hospital stay and postoperative complications. These results were mostly in accordance well with the previous meta-analysis [31]. In that meta-analysis, the authors found that the midvastus group significantly decreased lateral release rate compared with the standard group, while our result did not find different between two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were no differences in lateral retinacular release, blood loss, straight leg raise, hospital stay and postoperative complications. These results were mostly in accordance well with the previous meta-analysis [31]. In that meta-analysis, the authors found that the midvastus group significantly decreased lateral release rate compared with the standard group, while our result did not find different between two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An earlier meta-analysis [31] had compared the short-term results of the midvastus with the standard approach. Their results showed that the midvastus approach obtained better postoperative recovery, less lateral release and complication rates than the standard approach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the most popular approach to the knee in TKA. It provides excellent exposure of the knee joint, but violates the extensor mechanism and blood supply to the patella, which can affect early rehabilitation [62-64]. …”
Section: Surgical Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…described the midvastus approach in 1997. It involves opening an interval into the midsubstance of the vastus medialis while preserving its attachment to the quadriceps tendon in order to preserve function [62,65]. The advantages of this approach include increased patellofemoral stability, increased postoperative quadriceps control, and decreased scarring in the quadriceps tendon.…”
Section: Surgical Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, critics of this approach have argued that incising the quadriceps tendon weakens quadriceps function. More recently, the midvastus approach has gained in popularity due to its advantages of less postoperative pain, preservation of the quadriceps tendon, and more rapid recovery of straight leg raise motion [19][20][21][22]. In the current study, the midvastus approach provided greater improvement of knee flexion than the parapatellar approach, which may have occurred for two reasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%