2016
DOI: 10.1364/oe.24.027127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the information capacity of Laguerre–Gaussian and Hermite–Gaussian modal sets in a finite-aperture system

Abstract: Using a spontaneous parametric down-conversion process to create entangled spatial states, we compare the information capacity associated with measurements in the HermiteGaussian and Laguerre-Gaussian modal basis in an optical system of finite aperture. We show that the cross-talk imposed by the aperture restriction degrades the information capacity. However, the Laguerre-Gaussian mode measurements show greater resilience to cross talk than the HermiteGaussian, suggesting that the Laguerre-Gaussian modal set m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice therefore as to which modal set to adopt in any one system is simply one of taking advantage of the available component technologies, while respecting the known boundary conditions and likely aberrations and/or misalignments. Modal sets based upon OAM have the potential advantage of being circular, and hence match the typical telescope aperture, are rotationally invariant with respect to detection [90], have components available for efficient mode separation [91], and in some situations maintain their orthogonal properties of the modal set even when subject to aperture restrictions [92]. A particular concern in the use of spatial modes has been the impact of time-varying atmospheric aberrations and how they might result in cross-talk between the modes [93][94][95].…”
Section: Oam In Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice therefore as to which modal set to adopt in any one system is simply one of taking advantage of the available component technologies, while respecting the known boundary conditions and likely aberrations and/or misalignments. Modal sets based upon OAM have the potential advantage of being circular, and hence match the typical telescope aperture, are rotationally invariant with respect to detection [90], have components available for efficient mode separation [91], and in some situations maintain their orthogonal properties of the modal set even when subject to aperture restrictions [92]. A particular concern in the use of spatial modes has been the impact of time-varying atmospheric aberrations and how they might result in cross-talk between the modes [93][94][95].…”
Section: Oam In Communicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a typical measurement device does not register a continuous and infinite range of values, and it is thus necessary to consider discretized measurements. A most common approach is the selection of a finite set of transverse spatial modes labeled by discrete mode indexes [26][27][28][29], for which MUB measurements are attainable by the use of phase holograms [6]. Free-space [30], multi-core fibers [31] or on-chip [32] path encoding as well as time-bin [33] are also interesting techniques with potencial for high-dimensionality.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general it has been found that higher order modes are indeed more resilient than Gaussian modes [17]. In the presence of a restricted aperture, LG (or rather OAM modes) modes have a larger information capacity than HG modes [21], but if this is not the case then HG modes are a promising candidate as they are robust against tip/tilt aberrations [22]- [24].…”
Section: Arxiv:190107203v1 [Physicsoptics] 22 Jan 2019mentioning
confidence: 99%