2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.05.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Incidence and Clinical Data for Simultaneous Bilateral Versus Unilateral Total Hip Arthroplasty in New York State Between 1990 and 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were similar to those reported in previous studies in other countries, including America and Denmark. [6,8,26] Finally, this was a retrospective review, so studies with a higher level of evidence are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were similar to those reported in previous studies in other countries, including America and Denmark. [6,8,26] Finally, this was a retrospective review, so studies with a higher level of evidence are necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvements in surgical technique, anaesthesiology (introduction of hypotensive anaesthesia), anticoagulant therapy and early mobilisation showed decrease in numbers of reported complications of this type. Berend and Glait [36,37] found increased incidence rate of pulmonary thromboembolism, while majority of other authors did not mention similar findings [20,[38][39][40][41]. Some of the authors who failed to find any thromboembolic complications in their series of simultaneous procedures explain this as a better adaptation of a patient to mobilisation protocols when both hips are operated.…”
Section: Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…He explained that in a staged group, blood loss is a sum of losses in two surgeries that are separated long enough for organism to compensate loss from first surgery. Some authors did not discover any increased blood loss in a simultaneous group [17,25,37,44]. Glait pointed out that an increased need for transfusion can be expected if a simultaneous procedure is performed by a less experienced surgeon [37].…”
Section: Simultaneous Bilateral Total Hip Arthroplastymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure supporters claim that there is no significant difference regarding perioperative complications after simultaneous bilateral procedure comparing to the two stage procedure [2][3][4][5] . Opponents of this method report higher rate of systemic complications, thromboembolic complications, cardiopulmonary complications, infections, more frequent revision surgery, higher need for blood transfusion and higher mortality rate [6][7][8][9][10][11] . Likewise, there is no consensus regarding selection of patients neither an absolute indication for performing simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations vary a lot: some authors advise performing procedure in patients classified as ASA score 1 or 2 5,13,14 , while others performed surgery in patients belonging from ASA scores 1-4 4 . There is a consensus that simultaneous bilateral procedure leads to the reduction of cost and hospital stay 11,13,15 . Also, there is agreement that performing single stage bilateral procedure contributes to significantly better outcome of patients with bilateral coxarthrosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%