2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the implementation of concrete recycling in the Australian and Japanese construction industries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 227 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
118
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These approaches are listed in ascending order according to their adverse impact to the environment from low to high. Among these methods, reuse and recycle is regarded as the best alternative for managing the generated waste because of its minimal influence on the environment in while reducing the cost of waste disposal (Tam, 2009). When reuse and recycle becomes difficult, waste should be disposed at landfills and/or public fills to avoid polluting the environment (Seadon, 2010).…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are listed in ascending order according to their adverse impact to the environment from low to high. Among these methods, reuse and recycle is regarded as the best alternative for managing the generated waste because of its minimal influence on the environment in while reducing the cost of waste disposal (Tam, 2009). When reuse and recycle becomes difficult, waste should be disposed at landfills and/or public fills to avoid polluting the environment (Seadon, 2010).…”
Section: Model Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for the increase of the volume of C&D waste are old structures that have overcome their use expectancy and need to be demolished, new requirements and necessities leading to the demolition of otherwise still viable structures and destructive natural phenomena like earthquakes and storms [4].…”
Section: Construction and Demolition Wastementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recycled aggregates are produced by natural aggregates producers (50%), contractors (36%) and debris recycling centers (14%) [7]. In Japan, the concrete recycling ratio reached 98% in 2003, from 65% in 1995, the most common application being as sub-base material in road construction [4]. Tam [4] analyzed the situation of C&D waste recycling in Australia.…”
Section: The Use Of Candd Waste As Aggregates In New Concretementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some materials, such as steel or aluminium, recycling can confer savings of more than half the embodied energy as well as GHG emissions (Yan et al, 2010). Tam (2009) has commented that recycling concrete waste should be one of the best methods to improve its environmental impact but, in studies of the Australian and Japanese construction industries, major difficulties were found to be involved. In the UK, the majority of recycled and secondary aggregates have been used as alternatives to primary aggregates in local fill and related aggregates markets.…”
Section: Deconstruction and Waste Disposalmentioning
confidence: 99%