2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-022-01959-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Heliospheric Cataloging, Analysis, and Techniques Service (HELCATS) Manual and Automatic Catalogues of Coronal Mass Ejections Using Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory/Heliospheric Imager (STEREO/HI) Data

Abstract: We present the results of a comparative study between automatic and manuallycompiled coronal mass ejection (CME) catalogues based on observations from the Heliospheric Imagers (HIs) on-board NASA's Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory (STEREO) spacecraft. Using CACTus, CMEs are identified in HI data using an

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 49 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to note that most of the techniques mentioned above are not automated, hence the resulting parameters are highly dependent on the specific user that utilizes them. On the other hand, thus far automated or semi-automated techniques are not trustworthy enough compared to fitting by a human-e.g., automated routines may split one CME into multiple CMEs (Riley et al, 2018;Rodriguez et al, 2022). To the best of our knowledge, there is no published literature that explores how subjectivity affects the 3D CME parameters that are obtained from any reconstruction technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that most of the techniques mentioned above are not automated, hence the resulting parameters are highly dependent on the specific user that utilizes them. On the other hand, thus far automated or semi-automated techniques are not trustworthy enough compared to fitting by a human-e.g., automated routines may split one CME into multiple CMEs (Riley et al, 2018;Rodriguez et al, 2022). To the best of our knowledge, there is no published literature that explores how subjectivity affects the 3D CME parameters that are obtained from any reconstruction technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%