2020
DOI: 10.1364/ol.392724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the fundamental imaging depth limit of two-photon, three-photon, and non-degenerate two-photon microscopy

Abstract: We have systematically characterized the degradation of imaging quality with depth in deep brain multi-photon microscopy, utilizing our recently developed numerical model that computes wave propagation in scattering media. The signal-to-background ratio (SBR) and the resolution determined by the width of the point spread function are obtained as functions of depth. We compare the imaging quality of two-photon (2PM), three-photon (3PM), and non-degenerate two-photon microscopy (ND-2PM) for mouse brain imaging. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SBR total /SBR 2P shows the SBR improvement resulting from the 3PE contribution. Because the background for 3PE is negligible at these imaging depths (3,25), the background contribution is entirely from 2PE when a mixture of 2PE and 3PE exists. The calculated SBR upon 1340-nm excitation is 4.6×, 15×, and 82× larger than that at 1300, 1260, and 1220 nm (pure 2PE), respectively, because of the smaller contribution from 2PE at 1340 nm ( fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Mouse Brain Imaging At Different Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SBR total /SBR 2P shows the SBR improvement resulting from the 3PE contribution. Because the background for 3PE is negligible at these imaging depths (3,25), the background contribution is entirely from 2PE when a mixture of 2PE and 3PE exists. The calculated SBR upon 1340-nm excitation is 4.6×, 15×, and 82× larger than that at 1300, 1260, and 1220 nm (pure 2PE), respectively, because of the smaller contribution from 2PE at 1340 nm ( fig.…”
Section: Comparison Of Mouse Brain Imaging At Different Wavelengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et al 49 . The key idea of the BPM is to treat the scattering material as a series of planes that orthogonal to the initial light propagation direction.…”
Section: Modeling For the Two-photon Laser Beam Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The key idea of the BPM is to treat the scattering material as a series of planes that orthogonal to the initial light propagation direction. At each plane, we simulate the scattering by multiplying the local wavefront by a random phase term 49,50 . Here we adopt a 2D-cylindrical BPM model with laser propagated along the z axis to predict the wavefront in the water and brain (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Modeling For the Two-photon Laser Beam Propagationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B). Modern FLI and PLIM platforms cover an optical resolution ranging from sub-micrometer to several millimeters, a spectral range from 180 to 1700 nm and a time-domain resolution from sub-picoseconds to milliseconds, with measurement speeds that range from real-time for one-photon FLI and PLIM (Raspe et al, 2016;Trinh et al, 2019;Cheng et al, 2020) to several minutes per frame for two-photon PLIM (Rytelewski et al, 2019). By allowing quantitative, multiparameter and often non-invasive and nondestructive three-dimensional (3D) analyses of live cells and tissues to be performed, FLI and PLIM provide a broad support to the ongoing '3D molecular-imaging revolution'.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). These approaches are mainly associated with microscopy techniques that are used on transparent and/or thin samples, allowing for good light penetration depth (Cheng et al, 2020). However, when considering intact biological tissues, scattering becomes a prevalent phenomenon, precluding the ability to confine the detected photon to a localized 2D plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%