DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-85778-5_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the Expressiveness of Timed Automata and Timed Extensions of Petri Nets

Abstract: Abstract. Time dependant models have been intensively studied for many reasons, among others because of their applications in software verification and due to the development of embedded platforms where reliability and safety depend to a large extent on the time features. Many of the time dependant models were suggested as real-time extensions of several well-known untimed models. The most studied formalisms include Networks of Timed Automata which extend the model of communicating finite-state machines with a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, using region automata, one can decide the inclusion between the untimed languages of two timed automata in exponential space. The exact complexity of these problems had not been characterized, and the problem was wrongly cited in the literature as being PSPACE in [1,19]. In this section, we prove that untimed language universality and inclusion are actually EXPSPACEcomplete.…”
Section: Language Inclusion and Universalitymentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, using region automata, one can decide the inclusion between the untimed languages of two timed automata in exponential space. The exact complexity of these problems had not been characterized, and the problem was wrongly cited in the literature as being PSPACE in [1,19]. In this section, we prove that untimed language universality and inclusion are actually EXPSPACEcomplete.…”
Section: Language Inclusion and Universalitymentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We show that checking untimed language equivalence (and in fact language universality) is EXPSPACE-hard (and thus EXPSPACE-complete) for hierarchical systems and timed automata. We would like to mention that this problem has been wrongly cited in the literature as being in PSPACE for timed automata [1,19]. Our results are summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In this paper, we use his formalism for sequence diagrams but translate them into timed-arc Petri nets (TAPN), because of the annotated timing information. We chose Petri nets over timed automata [15] because of the simplicity to compose different Petri nets in parallel [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite the powerful modeling power of TA and its strong theoretical background, there are some subtle lacks that TA suffers from, which will be enumerated as follows. First, because of their low-level expressiveness, the size of the models for many practical systems might be unnecessarily huge [9]. Second, due to the explicit use of the invariants and constraints on the clocks, during the design of a model, inadvertent deadlocks may be injected into the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%