2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effects of atamestane, toremifene and tamoxifen alone and in combination, on bone, serum lipids and uterus in ovariectomized rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This latter observation is undoubtedly more surprising because numerous clinical observations reported that TAM is able to promote or to worsen fatty liver in women prescribed with this treatment for breast cancer, although recent studies concluded that the incidence of TAM‐induced steatosis is very low . Studies conducted in rodent models led to divergent results depending on the experimental settings, some of them reproducing TAM‐induced steatosis while others, in perfect agreement with our observations, reported protective effects of TAM on the liver but also on glucose and lipid metabolism . Accordingly, Ceasrine et al highlighted the need for caution in the interpretation of metabolic studies that require transient high‐dose TAM administration protocols for creating conditional KO in tamoxifen‐inducible estrogen receptor ( ERT2 ) ‐Cre thyroglobulin ( Tg ) mice, demonstrating an improved glucose tolerance in both male and female mice 1 week after the last dose and even 3 weeks later in male mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This latter observation is undoubtedly more surprising because numerous clinical observations reported that TAM is able to promote or to worsen fatty liver in women prescribed with this treatment for breast cancer, although recent studies concluded that the incidence of TAM‐induced steatosis is very low . Studies conducted in rodent models led to divergent results depending on the experimental settings, some of them reproducing TAM‐induced steatosis while others, in perfect agreement with our observations, reported protective effects of TAM on the liver but also on glucose and lipid metabolism . Accordingly, Ceasrine et al highlighted the need for caution in the interpretation of metabolic studies that require transient high‐dose TAM administration protocols for creating conditional KO in tamoxifen‐inducible estrogen receptor ( ERT2 ) ‐Cre thyroglobulin ( Tg ) mice, demonstrating an improved glucose tolerance in both male and female mice 1 week after the last dose and even 3 weeks later in male mice.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…(20) Studies conducted in rodent models led to divergent results depending on the experimental settings, some of them reproducing TAMinduced steatosis (21,22) while others, in perfect agreement with our observations, reported protective effects of TAM on the liver (23,24) but also on glucose and lipid metabolism. (24)(25)(26)(27)(28) Accordingly, Ceasrine et al (24) highlighted the need for caution in the interpretation of metabolic studies that require transient high-dose TAM administration protocols for creating conditional KO in tamoxifen-inducible estrogen receptor (ERT2)-Cre thyroglobulin (Tg) mice, demonstrating an improved glucose tolerance in both male and female mice 1 week after the last dose and even 3 weeks later in male mice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upon recovery for 2 weeks, the OVX rats were randomly divided into seven treatment groups and orally administrated with vehicle, 17β-estradiol (2 mg/kg day) as positive control, tamoxifen (1 mg/kg day), raloxifene (3 mg/kg day), DBT (3 g/kg day), as well as combinations of DBT and either tamoxifen or raloxifene for 12 consecutive weeks. Dosages of drugs were conversed based on their clinical dosages and previous studies ( Maricic and Gluck, 2002 ; Cooke et al, 2008 ; Ahmet-Camcioglu et al, 2009 ; Goss et al, 2009 ). Dosage of DBT was coverted from its clinical dose: 30 g of AR and 6 g of ASR ( Zierau et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] It is an orally administered triphenylethylene derivative with antiestrogenic activity that is primarily used in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. [7][8][9][10][11] The radiolabeled compounds of TAM and TAM derivatives specific to the ERs were prepared in numerous studies. Regarding the mechanism of action of the radiolabeled TOR, only 11 C-and 3 H-related studies were performed, to today date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%