2015
DOI: 10.1080/15481603.2015.1018856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effects of an NLCD-derived dasymetric refinement on estimation accuracies for multiple areal interpolation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
35
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dasymetric techniques have recently been examined to refine areal interpolation over multiple time periods. Buttenfield, Ruther, and Leyk (2015) and Ruther, Leyk, and Buttenfield (2015) compared different areal interpolation techniques with dasymetrically refined source zones using developed land classes from the National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Their results demonstrated that dasymetrically refined and unrefined methods performed differently for shorter and longer time periods, with lower error rates in most cases when dasymetric refinement was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dasymetric techniques have recently been examined to refine areal interpolation over multiple time periods. Buttenfield, Ruther, and Leyk (2015) and Ruther, Leyk, and Buttenfield (2015) compared different areal interpolation techniques with dasymetrically refined source zones using developed land classes from the National Land Cover Database (NLCD). Their results demonstrated that dasymetrically refined and unrefined methods performed differently for shorter and longer time periods, with lower error rates in most cases when dasymetric refinement was used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buttenfield et al (2015) showed that improvements can manifest in some areas whether the dasymetric method refines source or target estimates, or both. Ruther et al (2015) included four different demographic settings in their study, and found distinct spatial and temporal variations in the error of estimates for different demographic conditions. High estimation errors were discovered in fast growing subregions, in areas that were more fully developed for both the source and target time periods, and in rural settings where NLCD is known to underestimate developed residential land.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It leverages additional complementary ancillary variables such as NLCD developed classes (21, 22, and 23) and road network buffer zones (100m buffer distance). The NLCD class selection follows Ruther et al (2015) for delineating refined areas.…”
Section: Third Spatial Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recent studies have developed spatially refined interpolation techniques with the objective of decreasing population estimation errors Ruther et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Areal interpolation coupled with spatial refinement has been demonstrated as an effective approach to reduce estimation errors in temporally interpolating population enumerated in a set of source zones (source census year) to target zones defined by the boundaries of the target census year (e.g. Ruther et al 2015;Zoraghein et al 2016). In this study, this approach is tested for estimating urban population of census tracts in 1990 and 2000 (i.e., the source zones) within census tract boundaries in 2010 (i.e., the target zones) using different ancillary variables for spatial refinement to create a temporally consistent time series of urban population distributions at the tract level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%