2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effectiveness of seeding and mulching+seeding in reducing soil erosion after a high severity fire in Galicia (NW Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
20
0
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Other treatment schemes were still found effective in laboratory settings but need to be validated in field conditions. Vega et al (2015) found that herbaceous seeding was not appropriate for increase postfire ground cover, and resulted in no reduction of soil erosion. Some critical spots inside the degraded area are also susceptible to be selected and treated, while the rest of the affected area remains untreated (for example, the bottom part of convergent long hillslopes or intersections of roads and waterlines) but these approaches were not tested in real scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Other treatment schemes were still found effective in laboratory settings but need to be validated in field conditions. Vega et al (2015) found that herbaceous seeding was not appropriate for increase postfire ground cover, and resulted in no reduction of soil erosion. Some critical spots inside the degraded area are also susceptible to be selected and treated, while the rest of the affected area remains untreated (for example, the bottom part of convergent long hillslopes or intersections of roads and waterlines) but these approaches were not tested in real scenarios.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For Prats et al (2013) hydromulching was highly effective during the first 19 months after its application, reducing total runoff volumes by 70% and total soil losses by 83%, and continued effectively during the third year following the wildfire. And for Vega et al (2015) mulching with seeding was clearly much more efficient that seeding alone in terms of minimizing soil erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, certain studies have noted contrasting behavior by burned soil in studies with high prefire variability in soil loss and rainfall between the burned and the reference or control plots (Cerdà and Lasanta, 2005). In addition to the high spatial and temporal variability of soil loss in Mediterranean ecosystems because of erratic rains, the following factors may also influence these contrasting behaviors of burned areas: the soil rockiness (Cerdà and Navarro, 1997a,b;Rubio et al, 1997); fire intensity and severity (Neary et al, 1999;Shakesby, 2011), and their recurrence (Gimeno et al, 2000); the postfire management, particularly as affected by ploughing (Edeso et al, 1998;Malvar et al, 2011Malvar et al, , 2013; and the measures taken to control the subsequent erosion (Bautista et al, 1996), such as the application of straw mulch (Fernández and Vega, 2014;Robichaud et al, 2014), seeding or mulching (Badía and Martí, 2000;Vega et al, 2015) or other applications for soil conservation and erosion control (Abad et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por tanto, resulta necesario ampliarla para que sea operativa, siendo imprescindible obtener unos rangos de esos índices de cara a la evaluación y caracterización de la severidad de los incendios. Además, actualmente está en marcha un programa de rehabilitación de áreas quemadas en Galicia y resulta crítico contar con herramientas operativas que ayuden a una rápida priorización de las zonas objeto de tratamientos de minimización de los riesgos hidrológico-erosivos asociados a los incendios (Vega et al, 2013(Vega et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified