2021
DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01112-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing the effect of two educational interventions on mothers’ awareness, attitude, and self-efficacy regarding sexual health care of educable intellectually disabled adolescent girls: a cluster randomized control trial

Abstract: Background Sexual problems of intellectually disabled adolescents are associated with their inability to understand sexuality. Given the important role of parents in forming the attitude of their adolescents towards sexuality, the present study aimed to compare the effect of two educational interventions on mothers’ awareness, attitude and self-efficacy regarding sexual health care of intellectually disabled adolescent girls. Materials and methods … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five studies were included [ 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 ]. Spain stands out as the country with the highest number of interventions ( n = 2.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Five studies were included [ 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 ]. Spain stands out as the country with the highest number of interventions ( n = 2.).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining intervention [ 131 ] targeted mothers of girls with ID. The training was more effective when conducted in face-to-face participatory groups rather than reading a manual alone, despite a manual being created specifically for this purpose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the parental education methods, face-to-face parental education had a medium effect size [0.57 (CI: 0.52-0.61)], whereas non-face-to-face parental education had a small effect size [0.23 (CI: 0.18-0.28)] (Figure 4 and 5 )[ 3 , 14 , 16 , 26 - 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%