2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2020.104141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing temporal sensory product profile data obtained from expert and consumer panels and evaluating the value of a multiple sip TCATA approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 6 training sessions were used to generate attribute lists and familiarize descriptors and methods to participants for evaluation of 4 product categories by the 2 temporal methods. As an alternative to a consumer panel with a larger number of participants, i.e., 50 consumers or more in previous studies [22,33,47], the current panel of 20 semi-trained participants with triplicate evaluations identified significant differences between the regular and sodium-reduced products for all of the evaluated food items.…”
Section: Suggestions For Methods Selection and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 6 training sessions were used to generate attribute lists and familiarize descriptors and methods to participants for evaluation of 4 product categories by the 2 temporal methods. As an alternative to a consumer panel with a larger number of participants, i.e., 50 consumers or more in previous studies [22,33,47], the current panel of 20 semi-trained participants with triplicate evaluations identified significant differences between the regular and sodium-reduced products for all of the evaluated food items.…”
Section: Suggestions For Methods Selection and Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Additionally, multiple intake evaluations are thought to better reflect the sensory experience during real consumption settings than single-intake assessments. Previous studies reported significant differences in the TDS profiles among intakes for beer [42], wine and cheese [43][44][45][46], milkshake [47] and orange juice [48]. Multi-sip/bite evaluations may provide greater insight of the differences between regular and sodium-reduced product temporal profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there are papers that extrapolate consumer likings using acceptance tests and sensory panels (Schiano et al, 2017), many papers confirm large deficiencies in the capability of trained panelists to envisage the preferences of consumers as discussed half a century ago by Ellis (1969) to one of the latest research of Maheeka, Godfrey, Ellis, and Hort (2021) confirming that consumer and expert panels cannot be considered as interchangeable and depend on the objective of the sensory study. There were no differences associated with type of sensory method used and type of food analyzed (p > .05; χ 2 test).…”
Section: Sensory Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The descriptors included on the CATA list were initially selected according to previous research [19,31]. Then a group of six semi-trained panellists evaluated the samples to adapt the initial list to their specific characteristics.…”
Section: Sensory Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CATA questions consist of a list of words or phrases from which consumers should select all the attributes that they consider appropriate to describe samples [16,17]. In a recent study, Maheeka et al [19] reported that consumer and expert CATA panels are not interchangeable and panel type should be chosen in accordance with the study objective. CATA questions with consumer panels have proven to be a useful tool for the characterization of new fruit varieties, such as strawberries [13] and citrus fruit [20], and obtained information is more relevant from a commercial point of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%