Proceedings of the 15th ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2522848.2522869
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing task-based and socially intelligent behaviour in a robot bartender

Abstract: We address the question of whether service robots that interact with humans in public spaces must express socially appropriate behaviour. To do so, we implemented a robot bartender which is able to take drink orders from humans and serve drinks to them. By using a highlevel automated planner, we explore two different robot interaction styles: in the task only setting, the robot simply fulfils its goal of asking customers for drink orders and serving them drinks; in the socially intelligent setting, the robot a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(19 reference statements)
3
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The responses on all categories generally decreased from the pre-test to the post-test, with the biggest decrease on the Perceived Intelligence category. This is similar to the score decrease observed on a previous study which also used the Godspeed series as a pre-test [10]. To see whether this pattern was affected by the participants' experience either with HRI systems in general, or with previous versions of the JAMES bartender specifically, we carried out a multiple regression analysis.…”
Section: E Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The responses on all categories generally decreased from the pre-test to the post-test, with the biggest decrease on the Perceived Intelligence category. This is similar to the score decrease observed on a previous study which also used the Godspeed series as a pre-test [10]. To see whether this pattern was affected by the participants' experience either with HRI systems in general, or with previous versions of the JAMES bartender specifically, we carried out a multiple regression analysis.…”
Section: E Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Also, recall that this questionnaire is aimed to evaluate an overall impression of the robot system, whereas our focus in developing this Nao-based version of the robot was on approximating the basic capabilities of the original JAMES robot and on replicating the previous comparison between the two SSE versions. Note that a decrease in Godspeed scores was also found in two recent user evaluations of the full JAMES robot system [9], [10]. …”
Section: A Godspeed Questionnairesupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The interaction manager then selects high-level actions for the robot, which are processed by the output planner for execution as concrete actions by the talking-head controller and the robot motion planner. Full technical details of the system can be found in [19,25]. The work presented in this paper takes place largely in the context of the state manager (SM), whose primary role is to turn the continuous stream of sensor messages produced by the low-level input-processing components into a discrete representation of the world, the robot, and all entities in the scene, integrating social, interaction-based, and task-based properties.…”
Section: Social Signal Processing In the James Robot Bartendermentioning
confidence: 99%