2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24926-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing SVM and ANN based Machine Learning Methods for Species Identification of Food Contaminating Beetles

Abstract: Insect pests, such as pantry beetles, are often associated with food contaminations and public health risks. Machine learning has the potential to provide a more accurate and efficient solution in detecting their presence in food products, which is currently done manually. In our previous research, we demonstrated such feasibility where Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based pattern recognition techniques could be implemented for species identification in the context of food safety. In this study, we present a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(50 reference statements)
1
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and precision were used to assess classification performance besides accuracy as described by Bisgin et al (). Almost all tested algorithms resulted the greatest metrics for E .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three metrics including sensitivity, specificity, and precision were used to assess classification performance besides accuracy as described by Bisgin et al (). Almost all tested algorithms resulted the greatest metrics for E .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classification success of ANN, kNN, and SVM was evaluated in terms of accuracy criteria. For a two‐class prediction problem, performance of algorithms were compared by calculating the value of sensitivity, precision and specificity as described by Bisgin et al (). There are four possible situations including true positive (TP), false negative (FN), true negative (TN), and false positive (FP).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been many published methods for detection of food contamination utilizing traditional machine learning algorithms (Bisgin et al., ; Ropodi, Panagou, & Nychas, ; Ravikanth, Jayas, White, Fields, & Sun, ). There are potential possibilities for deep learning to replace the traditional machine learning method to achieve better detection results for food contamination in different food production procedures.…”
Section: Food Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compare the accuracy of ML and SVM in estimating coastal vegetation, in order to provide a steer to other studies. Specifically, we aimed to: From our knowledge of the literature [42,44,45,51], we hypothesized that SVM will have a better accuracy than ML in predicting LC classes using fused data. We also predicted from our knowledge of the region that mangrove area will have reduced in the delta due to deforestation, and Nipa Palm extent increased, over the study period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%