2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-017-0495-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing survey data with an official administrative population: assessing sample-selectivity in the IAB Establishment Panel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since 1996 the number of plants interviewed in each year has almost doubled and from 2001 onwards it amounts to roughly 16,000. Bossler et al (2017) provide evidence that the interviewed plants are representative of the underlying population.…”
Section: Institutional Background and Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since 1996 the number of plants interviewed in each year has almost doubled and from 2001 onwards it amounts to roughly 16,000. Bossler et al (2017) provide evidence that the interviewed plants are representative of the underlying population.…”
Section: Institutional Background and Datamentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The interviews are conducted face-to-face by professional interviewers, ensuring a high data quality and a yearly continuation response rate of 83%. In a comprehensive comparison of plants participating in the survey with the full administrative population, Bossler, Geis, and Stegmaier (2018) demonstrated that the survey sample was not selective in observable characteristics. More comprehensive data descriptions of the IAB Establishment Panel can be found in Fischer, Janik, Müller, and Schmucker (2009) and Ellguth, Kohaut, and Möller (2014).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(). Moreover, a comparison of the IAB Establishment Panel with the full administrative population of plants shows that participation in the survey is random in observable characteristics (Bossler, Geis, and Stegmaier ).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Assuming no compositional changes in the IAB Establishment Panel, the absence of a compositional effect induced by closures directly implies that compositional changes must be explained by market entry. Given our own work with the data, the published selectivity analyses (Bossler, Geis, and Stegmaier ) and the fairly constant panel continuation response rates over time, I am not aware of any indication that the assumption of a stable sample composition could be violated. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%