2014
DOI: 10.2478/jos-2014-0016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Survey and Sampling Methods for Reaching Sexual Minority Individuals in Flanders

Abstract: As part of a large sexual health study, we used two different approaches to target Sexual Minority Individuals (SMIs). Firstly, we drew on a probability sample (1,832 respondents aged 14-80) of the Flemish population in Belgium. Secondly, we set up a targeted sampling design followed by an Internet survey. Our focus was to explore how two different sampling procedures and survey designs could lead to differences in sample characteristics. Results showed that for female SMIs (we excluded male SMIs from the anal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the costs and efforts that are typically associated with population-based representative surveys, especially in small communities like Flanders, this requirement makes it very hard to acquire adequate data (Dewaele, Caen, & Buysse, 2014). Therefore, we believe that this study adds valuable information on the prevalence of gender ambivalence and gender incongruence in sexual minority individuals, despite the methodological shortcomings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Together with the costs and efforts that are typically associated with population-based representative surveys, especially in small communities like Flanders, this requirement makes it very hard to acquire adequate data (Dewaele, Caen, & Buysse, 2014). Therefore, we believe that this study adds valuable information on the prevalence of gender ambivalence and gender incongruence in sexual minority individuals, despite the methodological shortcomings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…With the information from these four items, a dichotomous variable was created, categorizing participants as non-heterosexual (i.e., "0") or heterosexual (i.e., "1"). They were identified as non-heterosexual when they reported to identify as gay/lesbian, bisexual or more gay/lesbian than straight and/or when they reported to have at least as many same-sex sexual fantasies as opposite sex fantasies, and/or when they reported to feel at least as often attracted to the same-sex as to the opposite sex, and/or to have had at least as many same-sex sexual contacts as with the opposite sex (Dewaele, Caen, & Buysse, 2014). This classification resulted in a total of 2,472 non-heterosexual persons to be included in our analyses; persons defined as heterosexual were excluded.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A majority of studies with sexual minorities rely on non-probability samples obtained through LGBT venues, media, or social and community networks (Meyer & Wilson, 2009). Non-probability samples of sexual minorities likely disproportionately represent individuals who are visible and connected to sexual minority communities; consequently, individuals sampled through non-probability methods may have different characteristics and may experience different stressors and resiliency factors than sexual minorities who are recruited through probability sampling (Dewaele, Caen, & Buysse, 2014; Drabble et al, 2018; Hottes, Bogaert, Rhodes, Brennan, & Gesink, 2016) Although stigma and fear of discrimination may impact participation and disclosure of minority sexual identity in probability samples (Robertson, Tran, Lewark, & Epstein, 2018), population-based studies remain important for obtaining minimally biased samples of SMW. Because research on strengths and coping strategies of SMW have relied primarily on non-probability samples, the experiences, perspectives, and strengths of SMW who may not be actively involved in LGBT communities or social networks are not well explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%