“…A majority of studies with sexual minorities rely on non-probability samples obtained through LGBT venues, media, or social and community networks (Meyer & Wilson, 2009). Non-probability samples of sexual minorities likely disproportionately represent individuals who are visible and connected to sexual minority communities; consequently, individuals sampled through non-probability methods may have different characteristics and may experience different stressors and resiliency factors than sexual minorities who are recruited through probability sampling (Dewaele, Caen, & Buysse, 2014; Drabble et al, 2018; Hottes, Bogaert, Rhodes, Brennan, & Gesink, 2016) Although stigma and fear of discrimination may impact participation and disclosure of minority sexual identity in probability samples (Robertson, Tran, Lewark, & Epstein, 2018), population-based studies remain important for obtaining minimally biased samples of SMW. Because research on strengths and coping strategies of SMW have relied primarily on non-probability samples, the experiences, perspectives, and strengths of SMW who may not be actively involved in LGBT communities or social networks are not well explored.…”