2016
DOI: 10.1177/0890117116668453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing State Legislative Aides’ Perspectives on Tobacco Policymaking in States With Strong and Weak Policies: A Qualitative Study

Abstract: Our findings support propositions posited in the Advocacy Coalition Framework. They point to the preeminence of contextual factors, notably political leanings and economic climate on success of policy change efforts. Lessons learned from participants from states with strong policy nonetheless show promise for success in states with weak policy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While ACF has been employed to study tobacco control policy adoption in high-income countries (e.g. the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, the United States) ( Cairney, 2007 ; Breton et al, 2006 , 2008 ; Smith, 2013 ; Wray et al, 2017 ; Sato, 1999 ; Wood, 2006 ), it has not been extensively used in the LMIC context ( Khayatzadeh-Mahani et al, 2017 ). In fact, we did not find any studies that used ACF to explore tobacco tax policy adoption in LMICs.…”
Section: Advocacy Coalition Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While ACF has been employed to study tobacco control policy adoption in high-income countries (e.g. the United Kingdom, Canada, Japan, the United States) ( Cairney, 2007 ; Breton et al, 2006 , 2008 ; Smith, 2013 ; Wray et al, 2017 ; Sato, 1999 ; Wood, 2006 ), it has not been extensively used in the LMIC context ( Khayatzadeh-Mahani et al, 2017 ). In fact, we did not find any studies that used ACF to explore tobacco tax policy adoption in LMICs.…”
Section: Advocacy Coalition Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We considered staff acceptable stand-ins, since they are involved in crafting policy, including researching, analyzing and summarizing issues. 20 Offices of 11 legislators agreed to participate. We interviewed 4 legislators (3 Assemblymembers, 1 Senator), and 7 legislative staff (6 focused on health policy, 1 on communications; 6 Assembly, 1 Senate).…”
Section: Legislatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is further complicated by the fact that policy subsystems can span several geographical divisions from local policy subsystems to policy subsystems around the world. The papers that cover the different spans of policy subsystems include one by Matti and Sandström (2011), who look at carnivore management at local county level in northern Sweden, and one by Wray et al (2017), who look at the global tobacco policy subsystem.…”
Section: Creating Contact: Functional Interdependencies and The Role Of Internal Brokersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As became clear during the process of analysis, some peer-reviewed papers that look at coordination in advocacy coalitions and are thus relevant for this review, do not use the term "advocacy coalition" in their title, abstract or keywords. A thorough analysis of the initial corpus identified a number of additional relevant documents based on cross-references, which were then included in the final corpus (Calanni et al, 2015;Ingold and Fischer, 2014;Nohrstedt and Olofsson, 2016;Wray et al, 2017). However, the limitation remains that the final corpus probably does not include all papers that deal with coordination in advocacy coalitions.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%