2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.10.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing spatial accessibility to conventional medicine and complementary and alternative medicine in Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has led to variability in access to and use of qualified and regulated CAM practitioners across the country. [19202122] For example while cancer patients in the province of British Columbia may access (for a fee) licensed naturopaths, TCM doctors, acupuncturists, massage therapists and chiropractors, those living in the Atlantic provinces have limited access to a small range of regulated CAM practitioners.…”
Section: Landscape: the Canadian Context For Complementary And Alternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has led to variability in access to and use of qualified and regulated CAM practitioners across the country. [19202122] For example while cancer patients in the province of British Columbia may access (for a fee) licensed naturopaths, TCM doctors, acupuncturists, massage therapists and chiropractors, those living in the Atlantic provinces have limited access to a small range of regulated CAM practitioners.…”
Section: Landscape: the Canadian Context For Complementary And Alternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other CAM studies evaluate spatial patterns with more precision by utilizing actual (or an aggregation of) geocoded points of CAM supply. Examples of this style of research include: Verheij et al () in the Netherlands; Smith and Carber () and Albert and Butar () in the United States; Hughes () in the Republic of Ireland; Wardle et al () in Australia; Egan et al () in the United Kingdom; Sanders et al () in New Zealand; and Meyer (, ) in Canada. Although not specifically emphasizing accessibility, studies by Williams (), Albert and Butar (), and Albert () uniquely consider both spatial and temporal aspects of CAM supply.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars choose accessibility calculation methods based on their research perspectives (Geurs and Wee, 2004). For example, Holl (2007) used several indicators that are based on a gravity model to compare accessibility changes related to highway construction, Hou and Li (2011) determined highway and expressway accessibility by considering the average travel times to refine accessibility improvement, and Meyer (2012) employed the road network distance to measure spatial accessibility. In particular, scholars have emphasized the importance of network effects (Laird et al, 2005;Condeço-Melhorado et al, 2011) and suggest that the topological structure characteristics of networks are an important consideration when measuring accessibility (Dupuy and Stransky, 1996;Meijers et al, 2012;Yu et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%