2001
DOI: 10.1007/bf02504503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing social desirability responding on world wide web and paper-administered surveys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only one study (Bongey et al 2006) used actual attendance counts in one of the two courses in addition to students' selfreported questionnaire data. A limitation of self-reported data is that participants usually have correct notions about socially desirable answers, and thus tend to provide answers that cause them to look good (Hakkarainen et al 2001;Hancock and Flowers 2001;Rosenfeld et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one study (Bongey et al 2006) used actual attendance counts in one of the two courses in addition to students' selfreported questionnaire data. A limitation of self-reported data is that participants usually have correct notions about socially desirable answers, and thus tend to provide answers that cause them to look good (Hakkarainen et al 2001;Hancock and Flowers 2001;Rosenfeld et al 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as indicated by Hakkarainen et al (2001), a general problem of studies based on self-reported data is that participants usually have correct notions about socially desirable answers, which can be referred to as the tendency to provide answers that cause the respondent to look good (Rosenfeld, Booth-Kewley, Edwards, & Thomas, 1996). Social desirability responding has long been viewed as a potential source of error variance in self-report measures (Hancock & Flowers, 2001). 1 Descriptive studies describe conditions as they exist in a particular setting (e.g., the number of teachers at different grade levels who use computer-based instruction).…”
Section: Types and Quality Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A general problem of studies based on self-reported data is that participants usually have correct notions about socially desirable answers, which can be referred to as the tendency to provide answers that cause the respondent to look good (Hakkarainen et al, 2001;Rosenfeld, Booth-Kewley, Edwards & Thomas, 1996). Social desirability responding has long been viewed as a potential source of error variance in self-report measures (Hancock & Flowers, 2001). In addition, studies that employed observations as a means to collect data did not report any inter-observer or intra-observer agreement reliability.…”
Section: Limitations Of Previous Empirical Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%