2019
DOI: 10.1080/07011784.2019.1623077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing single and multi-objective hydrologic model calibration considering reservoir inflow and streamflow observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Process-driven models have also been adopted for hydrological purposes in the ARB, mainly for long-term river flow forecasting. Toth et al [29] investigated the annual variability of the Athabasca River using WATFLOOD, a widely used physical-based hydrological model [30][31][32][33][34]. Historical river flow records along with topography information, rainfall, and temperature were employed to forecast flow regimes at Fort McMurray.…”
Section: Graphical Presentation Of the Modelled Outputs Using Daily Average Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process-driven models have also been adopted for hydrological purposes in the ARB, mainly for long-term river flow forecasting. Toth et al [29] investigated the annual variability of the Athabasca River using WATFLOOD, a widely used physical-based hydrological model [30][31][32][33][34]. Historical river flow records along with topography information, rainfall, and temperature were employed to forecast flow regimes at Fort McMurray.…”
Section: Graphical Presentation Of the Modelled Outputs Using Daily Average Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the studies of hydrological uncertainty, the uncertainty of the model parameter is an important aspect [11][12][13][14]. In traditional hydrological forecasting studies, the model should be localized by parameter calibration [15][16][17][18]. However, many studies have found that it is difficult to find a certain set of parameters that can yield model performances much better than other parameter sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%