2019
DOI: 10.1002/hpm.2817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing selected countries using sin tax policy in sustainable health financing: Implications for developing countries

Abstract: Summary Background Sustainable health financing is one of the main challenges of policy makers and planners. This study aimed at comparing the experiences of countries in using the sin tax policies for sustainable health financing resources. Methods This qualitative study was conducted in two phases. First, a comparative study was carried out by searching databases from 1990 to 2017, and six countries (Thailand, England, Australia, the Philippines, South Africa, and Vietnam) were selected. Second, the existing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We skip the ndings of the comparative study and content analysis of documents because these ndings have been published in previous studies by Javadinasab et al (18,19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We skip the ndings of the comparative study and content analysis of documents because these ndings have been published in previous studies by Javadinasab et al (18,19).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different ideas in this regard in Iran and what was called a sustainable nancial resource in the documents and regulations and health general policies is sin tax. Moreover, we can name health donators, VAT, targeted subsidies, religious money, part of a trade, and social responsibility insurances of factories and companies as sustainable nancial resources in case the regulations will be executed well (19). In Iran, a very small part of tobacco tax and sweetened drinks have been allocated to MOHME, and based on the determined task in Article 48 of incorporation law (2), only in 2018 succeeded to provide a list of harmful goods that regarding the economic and political conditions of the country, not even a penny of that was received (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1992, the World Bank underscored the creation of the National Health service and went further to propose the establishment of a National Health Development Fund (NHDF) incremental to the MOH budget [ 37 ]. Analogous to what is now termed ‘sin tax’ that is being promoted as one of the diversified means of raising funds for UHC [ 51 , 52 ], a proposal was made to fund the NHDF through taxes on alcohol or tobacco. The NHDF was intended to be earmarked for essential primary care and preventive health services, especially in poor, underserved rural and urban communities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many counties applied sin taxes on tobacco and alcohol, like Thailand, Philippines, South Africa, England, and Australia, and reported success in reducing smoking prevalence. This encouraged policymakers and public health workers to consider a sin taxes policy to address obesity [4] . Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) are beverages with added sugar, and many products carry these criteria, like soda, nectars, sports drinks, and sweetened fruit juice.…”
Section: Impact Of Taxes On Sugar-sweetened Beverages (Ssb) On Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%