2022
DOI: 10.1109/lcsys.2021.3135260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Run Time Assurance Approaches for Safe Spacecraft Docking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given an accurate dynamical model, there exist tools to synthesize controllers that provide formal guarantees of safety. For example, control barrier functions (CBFs) [3] have been proposed to achieve this goal, and they have been proven to be successful in a wide variety of applications from multi-robot systems [4] to spacecraft docking [5]. In many applications, a significant challenge is maintaining safety with limited actuation: most physical systems have finite actuation capability, which manifests itself in the underlying models as constraints on the control input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given an accurate dynamical model, there exist tools to synthesize controllers that provide formal guarantees of safety. For example, control barrier functions (CBFs) [3] have been proposed to achieve this goal, and they have been proven to be successful in a wide variety of applications from multi-robot systems [4] to spacecraft docking [5]. In many applications, a significant challenge is maintaining safety with limited actuation: most physical systems have finite actuation capability, which manifests itself in the underlying models as constraints on the control input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%