Proceedings 1999 Design Automation Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36361)
DOI: 10.1109/dac.1999.781384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing RTL and behavioral design methodologies in the case of a 2M-transistor ATM shaper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies have shown that ESL reduces the design effort by 50% or more while attaining excellent performance results [33]. It has recently received significant attention, as the steady increase in hardware complexity has made it increasingly High level specification of hardware design (in C, C++, System C) Implementation in hardware description language (in VHDL, Verilog)…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that ESL reduces the design effort by 50% or more while attaining excellent performance results [33]. It has recently received significant attention, as the steady increase in hardware complexity has made it increasingly High level specification of hardware design (in C, C++, System C) Implementation in hardware description language (in VHDL, Verilog)…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have shown that ESL reduces the design effort by 50% or more while attaining excellent performance results [33]. It has recently received significant attention, as the steady increase in hardware complexity has made it increasingly High level specification of hardware design (in C, C++, System C) Implementation in hardware description language (in VHDL, Verilog)…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VHDL or Verilog), the Firm Core is described and synthesized for specific library and finally the Hard Core is described at the layout level. Because of the growing complexity of SoC designs [2], design reuse methodologies are known as the better way to bridge the gap between performance and time-to-market [15,13] with nowadays methodologies and tools. For IP integrators, the challenges consist in understanding all the specifications of existing blocks responding to his needs, and in testing and interface development [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%