The 13th IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications
DOI: 10.1109/pimrc.2002.1045204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing RLS and LMS adaptive equalizers for nonstationary wireless channels in mobile ad hoc networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such equalizer structures suffer from several principal disadvantages (such as the additional time the prewhitening filter requires for convergence and the suboptimum solution in presence of additive Gaussian noise). It has been proven that, RLS will always outperform LMS [19]. As a result, the performance of EVA is close to RLS but better than LMS as obtained in our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…As such equalizer structures suffer from several principal disadvantages (such as the additional time the prewhitening filter requires for convergence and the suboptimum solution in presence of additive Gaussian noise). It has been proven that, RLS will always outperform LMS [19]. As a result, the performance of EVA is close to RLS but better than LMS as obtained in our study.…”
supporting
confidence: 79%
“…RLS-based algorithms have good performance when applied in non-stationary channel models [26] but at the costs of increased computational complexity and possible instability [27]. Since the optical fiber channel changes only very slowly, we choose the LMS algorithm.…”
Section: Training and Decision Modesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the NVIS channel shows multipath at some parts of the day and a high doppler spread as we can see in Orga et al, the recursive least squares (RLS) equalizer has been adopted for all the modulation schemes, as suggested in Wang et al PS=f=fmfalse/2BWfalse/2fmfalse/2+BWfalse/2XSfalse(ffalse)2BW PN=f=fmfalse/2BWfalse/2fmfalse/2+BWfalse/2XNfalse(ffalse)2BW SNR=PSPNPN Ebfalse/N0dB=SNRdB+BWdBEbdB. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%