2020 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/icce46568.2020.9043102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Response Time of Home IoT Devices with or without Cloud

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, Herrera et al [6] proposed DADO framework, which provides scalable deployment plans that trade-off execution time and reduce response time. Another measurement study, conducted by Lee et al [7], examines common IoT home devices response times, such as smart lights and smart plug. This study includes a performance comparison with and without cloud concept.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, Herrera et al [6] proposed DADO framework, which provides scalable deployment plans that trade-off execution time and reduce response time. Another measurement study, conducted by Lee et al [7], examines common IoT home devices response times, such as smart lights and smart plug. This study includes a performance comparison with and without cloud concept.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delays among IoT Components. We use delays recorded among real IoT components from previous works [33], [34]. These works study the response time of typical home IoT devices when multiple clouds interact with each other, such as user IoT and IFTTT clouds.…”
Section: Smart Home Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table III shows the mean and std of delays in seconds. The high and unreliable delays stem from (1) remote clouds that incur high round-trip time delays, (2) events traversing across multiple proprietary vendor clouds, (3) authentication overhead from TLS connections, and (4) the processing time overhead at the clouds due to the app and device identification [33]. In our experiments, we randomly sample the delays from a Gaussian distribution using the mean and standard deviation of delays between each component.…”
Section: Smart Home Deploymentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the server-side reproduces the processing of incoming requests from IoT devices, updating the parking status and communicating the information back to the client. As deduced from [104,105,106], typical processing and response times for IoT devices in an Internet-connected infrastructure system are likely to range anywhere between milliseconds to several seconds or even minutes, depending on the network congestion and the computational load exerted on the target system. Taking into account that in the given scenario, up to 500 IoT devices can be required to continuously transmit status information for parking availability, as well as execute heavy-duty tasks of detecting the presence of each arriving vehicle, several adjustments were made on the server end to reflect realistic conditions.…”
Section: Server-side Emulationmentioning
confidence: 99%