2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10682-011-9498-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing resource exploitation and allocation of two closely related aphid parasitoids sharing the same host

Abstract: International audienceSpecies belonging to the same guild (i.e. sharing the same resources) can reduce the negative effects of resource competition through niche partitioning. Coexisting species may differ in their resource exploitation and in the associated allocation of nutrients, depending on their resource niche. Trade-offs in nutrient allocation, such as between reproduction and survival, or between early and late reproduction, are moderated by the abundance and distribution of resources. In this study we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a scarce amount of information in the literature concerning competitive outcomes between the Aphidiinae species in this study, but our results show some indication that such interspecific interactions are not a major factor in determining relative abundance patterns. This can be due to resource partitioning, as Aphidiinae species have been known to exhibit distinct host resource exploitation strategies while exploiting the same host species, thus avoiding detrimental niche overlapping and allowing coexistence (van Baaren et al 2004, Le Lann et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a scarce amount of information in the literature concerning competitive outcomes between the Aphidiinae species in this study, but our results show some indication that such interspecific interactions are not a major factor in determining relative abundance patterns. This can be due to resource partitioning, as Aphidiinae species have been known to exhibit distinct host resource exploitation strategies while exploiting the same host species, thus avoiding detrimental niche overlapping and allowing coexistence (van Baaren et al 2004, Le Lann et al 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In relation to longevity, it is possible that the energy reserve accumulated and/or the energy consumption rate would differ between parasitoids emerging from the two cereal aphid host species, S. avenae and M. dirhodum . The interspecific differences in energy consumption rates may be linked to differences in metabolic rates of adult parasitoids (Le Lann et al., ): both A. avenae and A. rhopalosiphi display contrasted metabolic rates and life spans but accumulate a similar amount of energy resources when exploiting S. avenae (Le Lann, Visser, van Baaren, van Alphen, & Ellers, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aphid mummies were taken from the parasitoid colonies, isolated in small gelatin capsules ( 5 mm), and acclimated to the experimental abiotic conditions until adult emergence (3-5 d). Following emergence, each parasitoid female was placed in the presence of 2 males for mating and provided a honey solution (70% dilution) for 36 h. This duration allows females to reach their maximum egg-load (Le Lann et al, 2012). Parasitoid females were then held along with aphids and honey in the experimental arenas for 48 h, following the 2 protocols described below.…”
Section: General Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These densities are encountered in the fields on wheat shoots (Roschewitz et al, 2005) and encompass the realized fecundities for 48 h of both parasitoid species. A. avenae and A. rhopalosiphi are able to produce about 62 and 31 mummies in 2 d, respectively (Le Lann et al, 2012). Naive mated females (i.e., without oviposition experience or contact with other females) were individually introduced into experimental arenas to parasitize aphids.…”
Section: Effect Of Host Density On Offspring Diapause Incidencementioning
confidence: 99%