PsycEXTRA Dataset 2009
DOI: 10.1037/e733112011-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Real-World Behaviors of Drivers With High versus Low Rates of Crashes and Near-Crashes

Abstract: This publication is distributed by the U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, in the interest of information exchange. The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Department of Transportation or the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. If trade names, manufacturers' names, or specific product… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, driving behavior assessment has been associated to two main dynamic parameters that, among the others, have been proposed in scientific literature as the most significant for a quantitative evaluation of unsafe or aggressive driving style; these parameters are the longitudinal and the lateral accelerations and decelerations (Shaout & Bodenmiller, 2011;Klauer et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2011;Paefgen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, driving behavior assessment has been associated to two main dynamic parameters that, among the others, have been proposed in scientific literature as the most significant for a quantitative evaluation of unsafe or aggressive driving style; these parameters are the longitudinal and the lateral accelerations and decelerations (Shaout & Bodenmiller, 2011;Klauer et al, 2009;Johnson et al, 2011;Paefgen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data were stored in a computer mounted in the trunk of the vehicle and downloaded periodically. Major findings relevant to the youngest drivers included the following: (1) the crash rate was highest for the 18-20-year-old drivers; (2) short headway (time to collision < 2 s) was involved in most rear-end collisions; (3) inattention was observed in most crashes and near crashes; (4) the youngest drivers had the highest rate of aggressive driving behavior, prevalence of secondary task engagement, and distraction-related crashes and near-crashes (CNC) involvement [10,14]. The study demonstrated the unique advantage of ND methods for assessing crash risk due to distracting secondary task engagement by comparing the prevalence of secondary tasks observed in the moments prior to a crash or near-crash (by coders in a laboratory) with the prevalence of those tasks similarly observed during randomly selected baseline road segments.…”
Section: Car Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, relative to older drivers, novices are easily distracted from the driving task [9]. However, many questions remain about the nature of young driver risk, the relative importance of contributing factors, and individual variability in risk [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The final objective of most NDS is to identify driver and driving behaviors and characteristics that can be correlated to crashes or near-crashes [2], [4], [11]- [13]. In addition to NDS, works such as [14]- [17] also determine behaviors such as aggressive driving, tactical driver behavior etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A survey of NDS and similar studies shows that lanes and associated events are one of the critical informations in crashrelated studies [2], [4], [11]. Lane change events [11], lane type information [4], vehicle localization using lanes [18] etc.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%