2010
DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2010.140.144
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Reading Processing Strategies of Second Language Readers

Abstract: Problem statement: The message that a writer tries to convey in a text would be subjected to several interpretations by readers. Apparently, reading is a complex process of getting input. A well-known researcher offers two views of reading: (i) reading is a process of decoding written symbols and (ii) reading is a process of reconstructing meaning. It has also been proposed that readers used reading processing strategies in the process of understanding text. Most language educators are not aware of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(4 reference statements)
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this study reported that metacognitive strategies including many among thinking, text scanning, text summarizing, and self-questioning strategy were considered as the most essential for effective comprehension and learning how to read with complete meaning of the texts. To conclude, the findings of this study significantly validated the studies of (Franco-Castillo, 2013; Salataci & Akyel, 2002;Shah, et al 2010) that investigated multiple strategies for students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their comprehension performances and ability to handle written texts.In short, this study has provided the substantiations that engineering students can develop their reading comprehension ability through metacognitive strategies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The findings of this study reported that metacognitive strategies including many among thinking, text scanning, text summarizing, and self-questioning strategy were considered as the most essential for effective comprehension and learning how to read with complete meaning of the texts. To conclude, the findings of this study significantly validated the studies of (Franco-Castillo, 2013; Salataci & Akyel, 2002;Shah, et al 2010) that investigated multiple strategies for students to plan, monitor, and evaluate their comprehension performances and ability to handle written texts.In short, this study has provided the substantiations that engineering students can develop their reading comprehension ability through metacognitive strategies.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Recently, Shah, Yusof, Lip, Mahmood, Hamid and Hashim (2010) investigated the use of strategies through survey by comparing strategies in Malaysia. The results of the study indicated that differences were found among average and good readers.…”
Section: Review Of Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the study suggested teaching and learning metacognitive strategies for successful comprehension. Recently, Shah, Yusof, Lip, Mahmood, Hamid and Hashim (2010) investigated the use of strategies through survey by comparing strategies in Malaysia. The results of the study indicated that differences were found among average and good readers.…”
Section: The Metacognition In Readingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such findings between RA and strategy use support those of previous research (e.g. Akkakoson, 2013;Baker & Boonkit, 2004;Ghosh & Madhumathi, 2012;Hong-Nam, et al, 2014;Lee & Liao, 2007;Karbalaee, 2013;Shah , et al, 2010;Singhal, 2006;Sheorey & Boboczky, 2008;Zhang & Wu 2009). These findings provide strong evidence for the influence of reading achievements in strategies use in Brunei as an additional context for RCS research, and confirm that RCS use is related to reading achievements.…”
Section: Use and Relationship Of Rcs And Students Reading Achievementssupporting
confidence: 81%