2020
DOI: 10.1111/acem.13992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Rapid Scoring Systems in Mortality Prediction of Critically Ill Patients With Novel Coronavirus Disease

Abstract: Objectives: Rapid and early severity-of-illness assessment appears to be important for critically ill patients with novel coronavirus disease . This study aimed to evaluate the performance of the rapid scoring system on admission of these patients.Methods: A total of 138 medical records of critically ill patients with COVID-19 were included in the study.Demographic and clinical characteristics on admission used for calculating Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) and Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) and ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
128
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
128
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…122 Efforts to develop COVID-19 decision aids might include something like the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) rule to identify subsets of ED patients at lower 123 Alternatively, a decision aid might serve prognostic purposes to identify COVID-19 patients more likely to decompensate in response to the viral infection. [124][125][126][127] When decision aid investigators attempt to derive and validate these instruments, higher-quality emergency medicine research quantifying accuracy and reliability (or the elements of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging that become predictor variables of the decision aid) will be required as the basis for selecting variables likely to improve model performance.…”
Section: Potential Diagnostic Biases Skew Observed Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 Efforts to develop COVID-19 decision aids might include something like the Pulmonary Embolism Rule-Out Criteria (PERC) rule to identify subsets of ED patients at lower 123 Alternatively, a decision aid might serve prognostic purposes to identify COVID-19 patients more likely to decompensate in response to the viral infection. [124][125][126][127] When decision aid investigators attempt to derive and validate these instruments, higher-quality emergency medicine research quantifying accuracy and reliability (or the elements of history, physical examination, laboratory tests, and imaging that become predictor variables of the decision aid) will be required as the basis for selecting variables likely to improve model performance.…”
Section: Potential Diagnostic Biases Skew Observed Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The search process identi ed 1832 publications in the initial search. After screening, we included 36 studies in the systematic review , of which 27 were included in the meta-analysis [3,5,6,9,[11][12][13]15,16,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36]38]. The literature selection process is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Literature Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analysis execute a secondary analysis to expand the sample size, minimize the limitations of a single small sample clinical trial, to generate more comprehensive and reliable analysis results, thereby facilitating a better platform for medical decision-making. Therefore, it is an indispensable statistical method to determine the factors affecting the death of patients with COVID- 19. Some literatures only analyze the impact of a certain disease or lifestyle on the death of patients with COVID-19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%