2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Rankings from Using TODIM and a Fuzzy Expert System

Abstract: TODIM is, in its original formulation, an MCDA method developed to solve ranking problems. As an MCDA method TODIM combines the use of a multi-attribute value function as well as elements of the Outranking Approach, being founded on Prospect Theory. Recent advances in TODIM incorporate concepts from Fuzzy Sets. Although modelling multicriteria decision problems with Fuzzy Sets has been utilized when the available data are imprecise, their use in MCDA is slightly controversial, because the data fuzzification ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the fuzzy TODIM method which was proposed in (Krohling and de Souza 2012a , b ; Tosun and Akyüz 2014 ; Zhang and Fan 2011 ) is considered. The process steps of this method can be described as follows (Zhang and Xu 2014 ; Salomon and Rangel 2015 ): Step 1: Evaluate the criteria and alternatives …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, the fuzzy TODIM method which was proposed in (Krohling and de Souza 2012a , b ; Tosun and Akyüz 2014 ; Zhang and Fan 2011 ) is considered. The process steps of this method can be described as follows (Zhang and Xu 2014 ; Salomon and Rangel 2015 ): Step 1: Evaluate the criteria and alternatives …”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can summarize the differences and similarities between fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TODIM methods as follows: When both these methods of multi-criteria decision-making are compared in relation to the amount of calculations, fuzzy AHP requires more complex calculation than fuzzy TODIM. Pairwise comparison matrices for criteria and alternatives are performed in fuzzy AHP, while there is no pairwise comparison in fuzzy TODIM (Tosun and Akyüz 2014 ; Salomon and Rangel 2015 ). The Fuzzy TODIM technique does not require any limit to the number of criteria or alternatives used in the decision making process.…”
Section: Application Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the wide application in real life, it is designed to help people make effective evaluation, and to solve the defects of TOPSIS method and VIKOR method in the decision-making process. Then TODIM method has been applied widely (Pereira, 2013;Salomon & Rangel, 2015;Gomes & Rangel, 2009). Although classical TODIM is applied better than VIKOR and TOPSIS in solving MADM problems, it can only handle the format of crisp number (Fan, Zhang, Chen, & Liu, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Normalleştirilmiş P nm matrisinde n, alternatiflerin sayısını ve m, kriterlerin sayısını göstermektedir. Normalleştirilmiş P nm matrisi Tablo 2'de verilmiştir[48],[52].…”
unclassified