2019
DOI: 10.30963/aramit5808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing pitfall trapping and suction sampling data collection for ground-dwelling spiders in artificial forest gaps

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For spider surveys in agricultural landscapes, the efficiency of different sampling methods is often debated (Lang 2000;Sanders and Entling 2011). While commonly used, pitfall traps only capture the activity-density rather than the actual population density of the trapped species (Bali et al 2019). Suction sampling may therefore give better estimates of true densities, but is largely restricted to vegetation-dwelling arthropods (Sanders and Entling 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For spider surveys in agricultural landscapes, the efficiency of different sampling methods is often debated (Lang 2000;Sanders and Entling 2011). While commonly used, pitfall traps only capture the activity-density rather than the actual population density of the trapped species (Bali et al 2019). Suction sampling may therefore give better estimates of true densities, but is largely restricted to vegetation-dwelling arthropods (Sanders and Entling 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lors d'un inventaire arachnologique classique, la méthode la plus efficace (temps passé rapporté au nombre d'espèces collectées) est l'aspirateur thermique (Brook et al, 2008 ;Bali et al, 2019). Dans le cadre de La Planète Revisitée, la méthode la plus efficace a été la chasse à vue, avec 183 espèces, ce qui, au vu du nombre de participants et de leur expérience, n'est pas une surprise.…”
Section: Résultatsunclassified