Comparing Order Picking Guidance with Microsoft Hololens, Magic Leap, Google Glass XE and Paper

Lin, Georgianna; Panigrahi, Tanmoy; Womack, Jon; Ponda, Devansh Jatin; Kotipalli, Pramod; Starner﻿﻿, Thad

doi:10.1145/3446382.3448729

Cited by 17 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, software‐based solutions based on eye‐tracking are potentially affected by latency or inaccuracies since sensor and processing loops are involved. While the varifocal devices of the companies Magic Leap (two depth planes, 22 ), Microsoft (one depth plane, 23 ), or nreal 24 achieve partially sufficient image resolution, the image depth is restricted to only few depth planes as for the devices of vuzix (one depth plane, 25 ), Google (one depth plane, 23 ), AVEGANT (three depth planes, 26 ) and LightSpace Technologies (four depth planes, 27 ) with reduced image resolution. On the other side, devices providing up to infinite depth resolution often provide low image resolution (VIVIDQ, 28 CYVISION 29 and SeeReal Technologies 30 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Light‐field head‐mounted displays reduce the visual effort: A user study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Head‐mounted displays (HMDs) allow the visualization of virtual content and the change of view perspectives in a virtual reality (VR). Besides entertainment purposes, such displays also find application in augmented reality, VR training, or tele‐robotic systems. The quality of visual feedback plays a key role for the interaction performance in such setups. In the last years, high‐end computers and displays led to the reduction of simulator sickness regarding nausea symptoms, while new visualization technologies are required to further reduce oculomotor and disorientation symptoms. The so‐called vergence–accommodation conflict (VAC) in standard stereoscopic displays prevents intense use of 3D displays, so far. The VAC describes the visual mismatch between the projected stereoscopic 3D image and the optical distance to the HMD screen. This conflict can be solved by using displays with correct focal distance. The light‐field HMD of this study provides a close‐to‐continuous depth and high image resolution enabling a highly natural visualization. This paper presents the first user‐study on the visual comfort of light‐field displays with a close‐to‐market HMD based on complex interaction tasks. The results provide first evidence that the light‐field technology brings clear benefits to the user in terms of physical use comfort, workload, and depth matching performance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Light‐field head‐mounted displays reduce the visual effort: A user study

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Smartphones and other hand-held devices integrate hardware that aids in mapping the user's location and surroundings, such as multiple cameras with different sized fields of view, motion sensors, AI chips for computer-vision tasks, and even LiDAR scanners (Campi at al., 2021). Furthermore, research on dedicated hardware in head-worn format, although still far from widespread use, suggests an increasing pervasiveness of AR in everyday life and professional activities (Lin et al, 2021). In the AEC sector, AR shows advantages in addressing a variety of management issues (Ahmed, 2019).…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Scalable Ar for Bim on Telecommunication Network Sites

Palma

Spallone

Cicone

et al. 2022

Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. A growing number of research works, experiments and applications is investigating the potential at the intersection of augmented reality (AR) and the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. Project management, project communication, collaborative design, maintenance and construction progress documentation, construction site safety, and training are some of the cases that can benefit from blending real and virtual views through mobile devices. In recent years, research also highlighted how mixed reality and building information modeling (BIM) could cooperate to provide effective communication between multiple agents and closer interaction between digital information and the building site. Nevertheless, consolidated applications in these fields are still limited, especially when compared to other areas of AR adoption. This paper presents the development of an AR-based mobile app for exploring telecommunications tower sites and interacting with a related BIM database. The project aims to provide easy-to-use tools to maintain both the physical assets and an up-to-date model. We discuss critical issues in developing a scalable and interoperable application, supporting the feasibility study of similar solutions in the AEC sector.

show abstract

“…In the industrial world, the device is seen as a potential product that could complement the use of a smartphone and opens large fields of new applications. Researchers and engineers are developing consumer products based on various optical concepts and some of them have been now widely evaluated in different contexts 3,4,5 (education, medical, industry, military …). In the academic world, NEDs are also attracting interest as they allow the investigation of disruptive display concepts.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of a pixelated holographic display concept for a near-eye display: recent results and technological developments

Martinez

Colard²,

Fowler³

et al. 2023

Advances in Display Technologies XIII

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of an ideal optical system to support Mixed Reality and Augmented Reality (AR) applications has raised a lot of interest in the scientific community in the last decades. The perfect device remains an inaccessible target and researchers have to focus on the optimization of some specific behaviors. Several years ago, we introduced a disruptive display concept to push the device integration to the limit, with the suppression of the optical system. This allows the imaging process to be considered in a different way with a specific monitoring of the field of view. With this ‘smart glass’ concept, the glass is the display, and the image is formed directly onto the retina with a combination of refractive and diffractive effects. This conceptual target allowed us to define a technological roadmap to support our development. Technologies involved in this concept concern principally the field of Photonic Integrated Circuits in the visible range, digital/analogic holography and Liquid Crystal devices. We will present the current state of our research with a particular focus on the holographic display element. Recent results related to analogic pixelated hologram recording validate and question both our technological and conceptual approach. We will show images formed by sparse holographic pixel distributions with controlled angular characteristics that demonstrate the mix of refractive and diffractive effects. The transmission behavior of this holographic device will also be analyzed.

show abstract

Comparing Order Picking Guidance with Microsoft Hololens, Magic Leap, Google Glass XE and Paper

Cited by 17 publications

References 10 publications

Light‐field head‐mounted displays reduce the visual effort: A user study

Light‐field head‐mounted displays reduce the visual effort: A user study

Scalable Ar for Bim on Telecommunication Network Sites

Evaluation of a pixelated holographic display concept for a near-eye display: recent results and technological developments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About