Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers - ISWC '15 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2802083.2808408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing order picking assisted by head-up display versus pick-by-light with explicit pick confirmation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This popular technique relies on a multidimensional construct to derive an overall workload score based on a weighted average of ratings on six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, effort, frustration, and performance [34]. By studying the available literature [16,20,21,[35][36][37], it follows that this methodology is the most appropriate to assess the perceived workload with great success. Considering the implementation steps of this methodology, the adoption of NASA TLX requires the source of load and the magnitude of loads [38].…”
Section: Perceived Workload Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This popular technique relies on a multidimensional construct to derive an overall workload score based on a weighted average of ratings on six subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, effort, frustration, and performance [34]. By studying the available literature [16,20,21,[35][36][37], it follows that this methodology is the most appropriate to assess the perceived workload with great success. Considering the implementation steps of this methodology, the adoption of NASA TLX requires the source of load and the magnitude of loads [38].…”
Section: Perceived Workload Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nichtsdestotrotz erzielen die Pick-by-Vision Methoden sehr gute Resultate und weisen in acht der neun Studien geringere Fehlerquoten auf. Nur bei der Studie von Wu et al (2015) ist die Fehlerquote 0,5 % höher als bei dem Pick-by-Light System. Hinsichtlich der Kommissionierdauer ist die Methode Pick-by-Vision in 67 % der Studien schneller als die verglichenen Verfahren.…”
Section: Kommissionierungunclassified
“…In terms of average task time, Ref. [17][18][19] reveal that the pick-by-HUD method was faster than the pick-by-light and the pick-by-paper methods. Likewise, the pick-by-HUD method was more accurate than all other methods considered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%