Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference 2022
DOI: 10.1145/3512290.3528714
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing optimistic and pessimistic constraint evaluation in shape-constrained symbolic regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework allows the user to choose whether to input the expected domain of each variable or to estimate from the input data. This library is also combined with the shape-constraint 2 library to allow a high-level description of Shape-constraints [4,5] The srtree library 3 is responsible for managing and evaluating the expression trees. It supports optimized evaluation of vectorized data and the calculation of the derivative of any order for a given expression.…”
Section: Tir Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The framework allows the user to choose whether to input the expected domain of each variable or to estimate from the input data. This library is also combined with the shape-constraint 2 library to allow a high-level description of Shape-constraints [4,5] The srtree library 3 is responsible for managing and evaluating the expression trees. It supports optimized evaluation of vectorized data and the calculation of the derivative of any order for a given expression.…”
Section: Tir Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques have the advantage of having an extensive set of tools created to find an optimal parameters set. On the other hand, having a fixed form can limit the possible shapes the regression model can fit, limiting their extrapolation capabilities [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%