2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing of deep neural networks and extreme learning machines based on growing and pruning approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the proposed model has outperformed all previous study results applied on the same dataset such as ANN [4], KNN [5], NB [6], SMOTE + XGBoost [7], FNN [8], DNN [9], and hybrid autoencoder [10]. The best accuracy for multi-class classification problem on the SCADI dataset still goes for DNN [9]; however, it should be noted that they used hold-out validation method (60%/40% for training and testing) which is less reliable and increase the possibility of over-fitting and over-optimism, as compared with 10-fold cross-validation [47]. Finally, in term of binary-class classification problem, our proposed model has the highest performance by achieving the accuracy up to 98.57% as compared with the results from previous related works.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Model With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the proposed model has outperformed all previous study results applied on the same dataset such as ANN [4], KNN [5], NB [6], SMOTE + XGBoost [7], FNN [8], DNN [9], and hybrid autoencoder [10]. The best accuracy for multi-class classification problem on the SCADI dataset still goes for DNN [9]; however, it should be noted that they used hold-out validation method (60%/40% for training and testing) which is less reliable and increase the possibility of over-fitting and over-optimism, as compared with 10-fold cross-validation [47]. Finally, in term of binary-class classification problem, our proposed model has the highest performance by achieving the accuracy up to 98.57% as compared with the results from previous related works.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Proposed Model With Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Fuzzy neural networks (FNN) were reported as the best classifier, providing 85.11% test accuracy on the binary class of SCADI dataset. Most recently, Akyol (2020) evaluated the performance of deep neural networks (DNN) and extreme learning machines (ELM) on the multi-class SCADI dataset [9]. The study used the hold-out method to divide the data into 60% and 40% for training and testing data, respectively.…”
Section: Self-care Prediction Based On Icf-cy Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the prediction by our algorithm was compared with that of Kemal Akyol's research [11] (Tables 4-6).…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Navas et al [10] applied different artificial neural networks (ANNs) and empirical classification regression models to predict wind speed, and estimated the wind speed using the SPSS software. Using the growing and pruning method, Akyol [11] determined the ideal parameters (i.e. the optimal number of hidden layers, the optimal number of hidden layer neurons, and the activation function) of deep NNs and extreme learning machines, and verified the prediction ability of the designed model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%