1993
DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176349403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Nonparametric Versus Parametric Regression Fits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
822
0
5

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,004 publications
(845 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
18
822
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…1, which shows that the normal Q3 approximation does not have a satisfactory finite-sample performance. A similar phenomenon was observed by Härdle & Mammen (1993). If we ignore the inherited dependence structure, then one may obtain an erroneous conclusion; see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1, which shows that the normal Q3 approximation does not have a satisfactory finite-sample performance. A similar phenomenon was observed by Härdle & Mammen (1993). If we ignore the inherited dependence structure, then one may obtain an erroneous conclusion; see Fig.…”
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…Parametric models have the advantage of ease of interpretation and prediction, but 20 may suffer from misspecification, leading to erroneous conclusions. Hypothesis testing in nonparametric regression under independence has been discussed by Härdle & Mammen (1993), Hart (1997), Fan et al (2001) and Van Keilegom et al (2008). Other contributions can be found in Azzalini et al (1989), Eubank & LaRiccia (1992), Aerts et al (1999), Eubank (1999), Horowitz & Spokoiny (2001) and Fan & Jiang (2007).…”
Section: Q5mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistic T n is a modification of the test statistic discussed by Härdle and Mammen (1993) for the random sample case. The test was used in Gao, Tjøstheim, and Yin (2012) for a nonlinear cointegrating model with a martingale error structure and no endogeneity.…”
Section: Model Specification Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The asymptotic distribution of the test statistic (2.3) can be obtained using arguments as in Ait-Sahalia, Bickel and Stoker (2002), and because the large sample behavior of this test is not in the center of the paper we desist from presenting it here. Arguments for the consistency of bootstrap based procedures for the asymptotic distribution may be found there, as well as in Härdle and Mammen (1993). The following bootstrap procedure seems natural:…”
Section: Testing Conditional Normalitymentioning
confidence: 99%