2016
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000779
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparing Muscle and Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction—Does It Matter?

Abstract: Our data suggest that in essentially all clinical parameters, there is no difference between free flap type used for soft tissue coverage of the lower extremity. Patients undergoing reconstruction with a fasciocutaneous flap may return to weight bearing earlier--although they are more likely to require elective flap revisions. These results imply essentially equivalent outcomes regardless of flap type or operative indication, in contrast with some of the biases in the orthopedic community. The particular flap … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
57
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no selection bias toward a specific flap type could be demonstrated with regarding patient weight in our study. In contrast to the reports from Paro, Chiou, and Sen () who compared 86 muscle versus 35 fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity reconstruction and showed an increased rate of secondary procedures in fasciocutaneous flaps, our data did not exhibit this relationship, although a trend toward more fasciocutaneous flaps, in particular ALT flaps, was seen in cohort 2. One possible explanation may be the primary careful thinning and trimming of all of our fasciocutaneous flaps during the initial free‐flap reconstructive procedure to fit the recipient site in size and shape.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, no selection bias toward a specific flap type could be demonstrated with regarding patient weight in our study. In contrast to the reports from Paro, Chiou, and Sen () who compared 86 muscle versus 35 fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity reconstruction and showed an increased rate of secondary procedures in fasciocutaneous flaps, our data did not exhibit this relationship, although a trend toward more fasciocutaneous flaps, in particular ALT flaps, was seen in cohort 2. One possible explanation may be the primary careful thinning and trimming of all of our fasciocutaneous flaps during the initial free‐flap reconstructive procedure to fit the recipient site in size and shape.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Previously reported flaps used for local coverage of deep shoulder wounds following rotator cuff repair include the latissimus dorsa and pectorals major, both of which have been reported to have favourable outcomes [29][30][31]. Modern reconstructive literature indicates that utilization of well vascularized fasciocutaneous flaps is equivalent to use of a muscle flap for wound coverage, and the choice of the regional flap is at the discretion of the reconstructive surgeon [32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, muscle flaps may limit tendon gliding and their elevation for secondary surgeries (i.e., tenolysis) is harder [51] . Most commonly used muscle flaps are, according to many authors, latissimus dorsi, serratus anterior, rectus abdominis and gracilis [56][57][58] . The latissimus dorsi presents many advantages and it is a considered a "workhorse" flap.…”
Section: Muscle Flapsmentioning
confidence: 99%